First we'll start with the initial unsubstantiated story: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/03/police-involved-in-capitol-shooting-unpaid-due-to-partial-shutdown/?intcmp=HPBucket
As I am sitting here at work at on a 12 hours shift knowing that I will only be sitting here watching tv due to weather, now a civilian under contract with the army, wondering if I am going to get paid in two weeks, I've been pondering a few things in regard to this country. A country that I personally believe to have been God blessed and God inspired.
As I am sure you all remember the uproar when what's-his-bucket, a wannabe cop was acquitted of killing the wannabe thug. From my point of view, he was an unpaid member of society who used deadly force in protecting his neighborhood. The question that a jury answered was that he was justified.
Now in relation to that story, we have a story of unpaid capitol police (degraded to neighborhood watch) killing a woman who was driving her car in a manner which could be construed as "irresponsible". On one hand, I can see the gallantry and self sacrifice made by these men, to continue to work in defense of their nation, even though they are not getting paid for it. But on the other hand, I have to ask...what is the difference between them and the Florida neighborhood watch guy.....except that they were pretty sure that if they stayed out of the way of the moving vehicle, they were not in mortal danger in any way. In this case, they might have been certifiable police officers...but they were not being paid, which means that they were not on duty. Whether or not they were in uniform is irrelevant. They took it upon themselves to act in an official capacity. They were volunteers, thus lethal force is not authorized unless there is actual life threatening danger to themselves or others. (even when on duty that is the case) But the application of lethal force needs a grand jury when applied by "civilians (volunteers)"....and as we saw in the Florida case, the persons involved should be incarcerated until said grand jury makes that decision, or they post bail.
I noticed in the story that "shots were fired" but it never says that the woman fired shots. It is obvious that shots were fired...by the neighborhood watch patrol!
I think the police should be commended for working without pay. But watching a video of the incident, I am trying to figure out what the rational was for shooting the woman? The barriers at both the White House and Capitol will stop a Mac truck, let alone a small sedan. More importantly, doesn't D.C. have laws against people having guns, let alone carrying them in the open? Will the Justice Department show us another double standard?
I raise those questions because in our current society there are huge limits placed on people, because of the Department of Labor and their union handlers. Every police union, has in its contracts, that a police officer must be paid if he is to be considered "on duty." This raises the question of whether or not these police officers were legal to be carrying pistols in the District of Columbia....which unlawfully forbids American Citizens from doing so. As well as were they on duty or not? It looks like there are multiple laws being broken. Who will be accountable for that?
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Friday Funnies, On Thursday
I spent $5000 on a boob job for my wife. She was delighted. I spent
another $2,000 on a nose job for her. She was ecstatic. I spent $2,000
on liposuction for her and she couldn't thank me enough! But I spent 50
bucks on a blow job for myself and she goes fucking nuts! Women, I can't
figure them out!
~ ~ ~
Dear Dr. Phil,
I was watching my next door neighbor's wife sunbathing topless from my bedroom window. As I was jerking off, I turned to notice my wife was just standing there, arms folded, watching me. Is she a pervert of what?
~ ~ ~
A mother-in-law said to her son's wife when their baby was born: "I don't mean to be rude, but he doesn't look anything like my son.
The daughter-in-law lifted her skirt and said: I Don't mean to be rude either, but this is a pussy, not a fucking photocopier.
Late Nite Humor - Leno
How many are worried about a government shutdown? How many are more worried about it starting back up?
I'm glad the government has shut down. Think about it, for the first time in years it's safe to talk on the phone and send emails without anybody listening in...
~ ~ ~
Dear Dr. Phil,
I was watching my next door neighbor's wife sunbathing topless from my bedroom window. As I was jerking off, I turned to notice my wife was just standing there, arms folded, watching me. Is she a pervert of what?
~ ~ ~
A mother-in-law said to her son's wife when their baby was born: "I don't mean to be rude, but he doesn't look anything like my son.
The daughter-in-law lifted her skirt and said: I Don't mean to be rude either, but this is a pussy, not a fucking photocopier.
Late Nite Humor - Leno
How many are worried about a government shutdown? How many are more worried about it starting back up?
I'm glad the government has shut down. Think about it, for the first time in years it's safe to talk on the phone and send emails without anybody listening in...
Tuesday, October 1, 2013
Here's a REAL shocker, the War on Drugs, is NOT working!!!
I don't know that this story is telling me anything I didn't know. But I wonder about the price 'drop' they mention. Not that I'm out buying illegal drugs regularly [I get enough stuff legally every month to kill a moose!] but people who I know do buy, aren't saying prices are going down!
Maybe it's just that those guys in the E.U. and in Australia have better sources than my 'acquaintances' here in N.C.
.
The global war on heroin, cocaine and cannabis is failing to stem supply, as prices of these drugs have tumbled while seizures of them have risen, according to a study published this week.
Researchers analysed data from seven government-funded programmes that tracked the illegal drug market over more than a decade.
Three of the programmes monitored international drugs trafficking; three focused on the United States; and one tracked the drugs business in Australia.
The prices of heroin, cocaine and cannabis tumbled by 81 percent, 80 percent and 86 percent respectively between 1990 and 2007 in the United States when adjusted for inflation, the researchers found.
Over the same period, the average purity of these drugs rose by 60 percent, 11 percent and 161 percent respectively.
In 18 European countries, the street price of cocaine and heroin fell by 51 and 74 percent between 2000 and 2009.
The entire idea that law enforcement types can keep people from 'changing' their mental state or WANTING to, by passing laws is THE stupidest idea being enforced inside the worldwide, modern legal system. There is something inside the human brain that seeks to change it's angle of view, and that's PSY 101 stuff, and every Freshman reads that shit too.
Too bad the guys who make laws aren't as smart as they think they are, or even as smart as an incoming college sophomore.
.
.
Schteveo
Maybe it's just that those guys in the E.U. and in Australia have better sources than my 'acquaintances' here in N.C.
.
The global war on heroin, cocaine and cannabis is failing to stem supply, as prices of these drugs have tumbled while seizures of them have risen, according to a study published this week.
Researchers analysed data from seven government-funded programmes that tracked the illegal drug market over more than a decade.
Three of the programmes monitored international drugs trafficking; three focused on the United States; and one tracked the drugs business in Australia.
The prices of heroin, cocaine and cannabis tumbled by 81 percent, 80 percent and 86 percent respectively between 1990 and 2007 in the United States when adjusted for inflation, the researchers found.
Over the same period, the average purity of these drugs rose by 60 percent, 11 percent and 161 percent respectively.
In 18 European countries, the street price of cocaine and heroin fell by 51 and 74 percent between 2000 and 2009.
Neither the purity of drugs seized in Europe nor the price of cannabis on the continent was given in the study.
The entire idea that law enforcement types can keep people from 'changing' their mental state or WANTING to, by passing laws is THE stupidest idea being enforced inside the worldwide, modern legal system. There is something inside the human brain that seeks to change it's angle of view, and that's PSY 101 stuff, and every Freshman reads that shit too.
Too bad the guys who make laws aren't as smart as they think they are, or even as smart as an incoming college sophomore.
.
.
Schteveo
Sunday, September 29, 2013
All A Big Lie?
So, could the whole story about the raid that killed Bin Laden have been a lie? That's the claim being made by a well-known (and serious) journalist, and a very liberal one at that. Now it is true that his claim is being made just about the time his new book on the subject is ready for release. But, could it be true? Would he dare make such an (explosive) claim without something solid to back him up? Is it possible we were lied to? Of course, knowing this Marxist govt., the answer to that question would be, YES!
Personally, that raid has always had me wondering. For example, we were told that OBL was killed by our SEALS, then his body was taken aboard a chopper and dumped into an ocean somewhere. The Muslim-in-Chief's administration has claimed this was done "to honer a long-standing Muslim tradition ". But experts on the Quran say that no such tradition exists. Besides, why would people who live primarily in desert countries have such a tradition? And, why would we honor (any) tradition or belief held by the #1 killer of 3000 Americans? Hmm...
Then there was that (supposedly) "very top-secret" chopper that crashed at the compound, and had to be left behind. Seriously? If it was really that "top-secret", do you really think they would have simply left it there? Hmm... This brings to mind a quote i once read;
"The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it..." -- Adolf Hitler
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/u-s-raid-bin-laden-compound-big-lie-journalist-seymour-hersh-claims-article-1.1470962
Personally, that raid has always had me wondering. For example, we were told that OBL was killed by our SEALS, then his body was taken aboard a chopper and dumped into an ocean somewhere. The Muslim-in-Chief's administration has claimed this was done "to honer a long-standing Muslim tradition ". But experts on the Quran say that no such tradition exists. Besides, why would people who live primarily in desert countries have such a tradition? And, why would we honor (any) tradition or belief held by the #1 killer of 3000 Americans? Hmm...
Then there was that (supposedly) "very top-secret" chopper that crashed at the compound, and had to be left behind. Seriously? If it was really that "top-secret", do you really think they would have simply left it there? Hmm... This brings to mind a quote i once read;
"The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it..." -- Adolf Hitler
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/u-s-raid-bin-laden-compound-big-lie-journalist-seymour-hersh-claims-article-1.1470962
Saturday, September 28, 2013
Just ONE of the things I really like about the 'South', ig'nern's, ol' fashioned ig'nern's!
I've been in every state in the country, and 30 countries around the World in my merry travels. So I get that there are places where the people are smarter than they might be in other places. And I've met my share of goons, goofballs and slack jawed yokels most everywhere I've gone. But when I read stories like this one, it lets me know that some places in the Old South are STILL the Old South.
.
A Sikh truck driver claims Mississippi traffic cops labeled him a “terrorist” because of his turban — and was then degraded in court when a county judge called the religious headwear “that rag.”
Jagjeet Singh, 49, a trucker from California, was driving through the Magnolia State when he was pulled over for driving with a flat tire in Pike County on Jan. 16, according to a complaint filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Singh was taken to a weigh station operated by the state’s Department of Transportation, where he says cops ordered him to turn over his “kirpan,” a 3-inch ceremonial blade that all Sikh men traditionally carry in their waistbands, the ACLU said.
The letter said that Singh tried to explain that the blade was a sacred talisman, and even showed the officers videos on his phone that explained the Sikh faith.
“In response, however, the officers laughed at him and mocked his religious beliefs,” the letter read. “One officer declared that all Sikhs are depraved and ‘terrorists.’”
But Singh was humiliated even more when he appeared in court for the charge in March.
As he waited for his attorney in the back of the courtroom, four officers approached him and told him that Judge Aubrey Rimes had ordered them to kick him out if he did not remove his turban, Atwood said.
Singh’s attorney went to the judge’s chambers, where his orders were allegedly repeated.
“He further stated that Mr. Singh would not be allowed to re-enter the courtroom unless he removed ‘that rag’ from his head and threatened to call Mr. Singh last on the docket if he continued to wear the religious headdress,” Atwood said.
.
I used to hate working in Mississippi. It always seemed like they'd missed the bus with respect to stuff like..knowing 1960 had come and gone, or that women could drive legally, or that men had walked on the moon. I used to really watch my speed down there and make sure that I was legal in every way, and shit like this story is why.
The other thing that concerns me on this, is the number of stupid people who still don't know just WHO the bad guys really are. I can get a couple of idiot DMV 'chicken coop' guys not knowing their asses from a hole in the wall. But a guy sitting on a judges bench, even if it is friggin' traffic court, HIM you'd expect to know something.
I am currently planning a road trip for my wife and I for our Anniversary, Mississippi wasn't on the list of states to drive through, now it's off the list of states to drive NEAR!
.
.
Schteveo
.
A Sikh truck driver claims Mississippi traffic cops labeled him a “terrorist” because of his turban — and was then degraded in court when a county judge called the religious headwear “that rag.”
Jagjeet Singh, 49, a trucker from California, was driving through the Magnolia State when he was pulled over for driving with a flat tire in Pike County on Jan. 16, according to a complaint filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
Singh was taken to a weigh station operated by the state’s Department of Transportation, where he says cops ordered him to turn over his “kirpan,” a 3-inch ceremonial blade that all Sikh men traditionally carry in their waistbands, the ACLU said.
The letter said that Singh tried to explain that the blade was a sacred talisman, and even showed the officers videos on his phone that explained the Sikh faith.
“In response, however, the officers laughed at him and mocked his religious beliefs,” the letter read. “One officer declared that all Sikhs are depraved and ‘terrorists.’”
But Singh was humiliated even more when he appeared in court for the charge in March.
As he waited for his attorney in the back of the courtroom, four officers approached him and told him that Judge Aubrey Rimes had ordered them to kick him out if he did not remove his turban, Atwood said.
Singh’s attorney went to the judge’s chambers, where his orders were allegedly repeated.
“He further stated that Mr. Singh would not be allowed to re-enter the courtroom unless he removed ‘that rag’ from his head and threatened to call Mr. Singh last on the docket if he continued to wear the religious headdress,” Atwood said.
.
I used to hate working in Mississippi. It always seemed like they'd missed the bus with respect to stuff like..knowing 1960 had come and gone, or that women could drive legally, or that men had walked on the moon. I used to really watch my speed down there and make sure that I was legal in every way, and shit like this story is why.
The other thing that concerns me on this, is the number of stupid people who still don't know just WHO the bad guys really are. I can get a couple of idiot DMV 'chicken coop' guys not knowing their asses from a hole in the wall. But a guy sitting on a judges bench, even if it is friggin' traffic court, HIM you'd expect to know something.
I am currently planning a road trip for my wife and I for our Anniversary, Mississippi wasn't on the list of states to drive through, now it's off the list of states to drive NEAR!
.
.
Schteveo
Friday, September 27, 2013
Broad Answers to Various E-mails
I am currently having trouble responding to or sending e-mails.
I've gotten several from the members here, the last from the Arachnoid resident of the Big Apple about guns, laws, lawsuits in MD. But my answer to him fits most of my thoughts about guns, gun ownership, mass shootings, etc. right now. So, here goes...
________________________________________________________________________________
Spider,
Right now, I'm
reading a book about the Civil War that was written around 1905. It's the 4th or 5th book I've gotten for free from the Project Gutenberg for my Kindle, about that same period of history. This writer was 17 or 18 when the war started, joined what became the
Illinois 61st, and worked up from a Pvt to getting a Commission as a LT.
I read a lot of that kind of stuff, and here's what amazes me more and more as I learn more and more. All of the writers talk about their family's firearms.
Most of those young men who lived in what was then the 'wilderness', could barely read if at all, and yet they managed to learn how, when and where to use firearms. They learned to build a fire without a Bic lighter, they could melt and re-melt lead to make bullets without killing or maiming themselves and others and without setting fire to the town, city, county or state. They learned to carry a pocketknife AND rifle to school so they could protect themselves AND hunt for dinner coming and going and the learned to skin that small game, without losing fingers, stabbing teachers or committing general mayhem with knife or gun.
In this book I'm reading now, he talks about his first battle being Shiloh. And he recounts that his Captain had to yell at him to get him to fire his rifle during his first skirmish, because he was looking for a distinct target in the haze of gunsmoke, but couldn't find one. The black powder they used then was NOT smokeless, so a minute into the battle, neither side could see their enemy's firing lines. He says he didn't want to 'waste' his shot because when he was growing up, lead was hard to come by.
He says he was taught to shoot squirrels in the head, so he that didn't waste the lead, powder or meat and fur, and that his friends were taught to shoot like that too! That's pretty damned good shooting considering the guns of the 1850's. It's a big WOW for me every time I read one of those kinds of stories, no matter how many times I read them.
But to wrap around to the present however, in a day and age where kids from the age of 3 or 4, have access to more knowledge at their finger tips than scholars had 25 or 30 years ago, we cannot teach those same skills. In fact, we have gun free / knife free zones AROUND schools where EVEN adults cannot carry a gun or knife! Places where even a picture of a gun is not allowed!
[with tongue firmly placed in cheek, he said...]
I wonder what changed about us, that we can't do what a 13 or 14 year old could do in 1860? Or why we can't draw a picture and not shoot or cut ourselves with that piece of art work? Are we that stupid or hapless?
.
.
Schteveo
I've gotten several from the members here, the last from the Arachnoid resident of the Big Apple about guns, laws, lawsuits in MD. But my answer to him fits most of my thoughts about guns, gun ownership, mass shootings, etc. right now. So, here goes...
________________________________________________________________________________
Spider,
Mary Land is just another state run by a minority of idiot hand wringers, who lord it over the populace!
I read a lot of that kind of stuff, and here's what amazes me more and more as I learn more and more. All of the writers talk about their family's firearms.
Most of those young men who lived in what was then the 'wilderness', could barely read if at all, and yet they managed to learn how, when and where to use firearms. They learned to build a fire without a Bic lighter, they could melt and re-melt lead to make bullets without killing or maiming themselves and others and without setting fire to the town, city, county or state. They learned to carry a pocketknife AND rifle to school so they could protect themselves AND hunt for dinner coming and going and the learned to skin that small game, without losing fingers, stabbing teachers or committing general mayhem with knife or gun.
In this book I'm reading now, he talks about his first battle being Shiloh. And he recounts that his Captain had to yell at him to get him to fire his rifle during his first skirmish, because he was looking for a distinct target in the haze of gunsmoke, but couldn't find one. The black powder they used then was NOT smokeless, so a minute into the battle, neither side could see their enemy's firing lines. He says he didn't want to 'waste' his shot because when he was growing up, lead was hard to come by.
He says he was taught to shoot squirrels in the head, so he that didn't waste the lead, powder or meat and fur, and that his friends were taught to shoot like that too! That's pretty damned good shooting considering the guns of the 1850's. It's a big WOW for me every time I read one of those kinds of stories, no matter how many times I read them.
But to wrap around to the present however, in a day and age where kids from the age of 3 or 4, have access to more knowledge at their finger tips than scholars had 25 or 30 years ago, we cannot teach those same skills. In fact, we have gun free / knife free zones AROUND schools where EVEN adults cannot carry a gun or knife! Places where even a picture of a gun is not allowed!
[with tongue firmly placed in cheek, he said...]
I wonder what changed about us, that we can't do what a 13 or 14 year old could do in 1860? Or why we can't draw a picture and not shoot or cut ourselves with that piece of art work? Are we that stupid or hapless?
.
.
Schteveo
Tuesday, September 24, 2013
From Our Centers of "Higher Learning"
Quotations From Academia's Front Lines in the War to Destroy America:
A ham-fisted socialist maneuver Obama employed against traditional America that should have caused much greater alarm is the nationalization of the student loan industry. In the short term, this was an act of looting to help finance ObamaCare. But in the long term it is a step toward universal coercively financed college education, just as ObamaCare is a step toward socialized medicine. John Hawkins has collected some quotations from college professors that help explain why Obama et al. would want every American to go to college. A few examples:
"We need to think very, very clearly about who the enemy is. The enemy is the United States of America and everyone who supports it."
— Haunani-Kay Trask, University of Hawaii at Manoa
"The people of the Third World need our sympathetic understanding and, much more than that, they need our help. We can provide them with a margin of survival by internal disruption in the United States. Whether they can succeed against the kind of brutality we impose on them depends in large part on what happens here."
— Noam Chomsky, MIT
"The only true heroes are those who find ways that help defeat the U.S. military… I personally would like to see a million Mogadishus."
— Nicholas De Genova, Columbia University
"As to those in the World Trade Center… Let's get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. … If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it."
— Ward Churchill, University of Colorado at Boulder
"I live to harass white folks."
— Derrick Bell, Harvard
"My experience traveling the last ten years has been that the majority of people who are activists have stayed the course in a way, in a variety of ways, devoted to overthrowing everything hateful about this government and corporate structure that we live in; capitalism itself, herself, himself, and determined to try to keep open and figure out how to move on…We who are, as we used to say, in the belly of the beast, it again means not that it's the only purveyor of violence in the world, but that we have an extraordinary special responsibility, not necessarily the most enviable one, of how to act here, inside the heart of the monster."
— Bernardine Dohrn, Northwestern University
"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
— Bill Ayers, University of Illinois at Chicago
Note that nutty professors Ayers and Dohrn are personal friends of Obama, and literally launched his political career from their apartment. Obama has urged us to open our hearts and minds to the racist communist Bell. These evil lunatics don't just run academia. They run the government too now.
We are witnessing a coup d'état by the radical left...
A ham-fisted socialist maneuver Obama employed against traditional America that should have caused much greater alarm is the nationalization of the student loan industry. In the short term, this was an act of looting to help finance ObamaCare. But in the long term it is a step toward universal coercively financed college education, just as ObamaCare is a step toward socialized medicine. John Hawkins has collected some quotations from college professors that help explain why Obama et al. would want every American to go to college. A few examples:
"We need to think very, very clearly about who the enemy is. The enemy is the United States of America and everyone who supports it."
— Haunani-Kay Trask, University of Hawaii at Manoa
"The people of the Third World need our sympathetic understanding and, much more than that, they need our help. We can provide them with a margin of survival by internal disruption in the United States. Whether they can succeed against the kind of brutality we impose on them depends in large part on what happens here."
— Noam Chomsky, MIT
"The only true heroes are those who find ways that help defeat the U.S. military… I personally would like to see a million Mogadishus."
— Nicholas De Genova, Columbia University
"As to those in the World Trade Center… Let's get a grip here, shall we? True enough, they were civilians of a sort. But innocent? Gimme a break. … If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it."
— Ward Churchill, University of Colorado at Boulder
"I live to harass white folks."
— Derrick Bell, Harvard
"My experience traveling the last ten years has been that the majority of people who are activists have stayed the course in a way, in a variety of ways, devoted to overthrowing everything hateful about this government and corporate structure that we live in; capitalism itself, herself, himself, and determined to try to keep open and figure out how to move on…We who are, as we used to say, in the belly of the beast, it again means not that it's the only purveyor of violence in the world, but that we have an extraordinary special responsibility, not necessarily the most enviable one, of how to act here, inside the heart of the monster."
— Bernardine Dohrn, Northwestern University
"Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
— Bill Ayers, University of Illinois at Chicago
Note that nutty professors Ayers and Dohrn are personal friends of Obama, and literally launched his political career from their apartment. Obama has urged us to open our hearts and minds to the racist communist Bell. These evil lunatics don't just run academia. They run the government too now.
We are witnessing a coup d'état by the radical left...
Monday, September 23, 2013
Did anybody else get the E-mail below?
Anniesinferno.blogspot.com Team,
I thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic for Anniesinferno.blogspot.com.
1. Your website Anniesinferno.blogspot.com is not ranking top in Google organic searches for many competitive keyword phrases.
2. Your company is not doing well in most of the Social Media Websites.
3. Your site is not user friendly on mobile devices.
There are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT for FREE.
Our clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your company's website traffic and online reputation. You will be happy to know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st page Google ranking for most of your targeted keyword phrases in our six month ongoing campaign.
Sound interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also available to meet you in person and present you this website audit report.
------------------------------ ------------------------------ -----
Best Regards,
Chloe Lee
Marketing Consultant
SEO Analyst
(315)-895-1453
PS I: I am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact again.
______________________________________________________________________________
I got this in my e-mail today, straight in, not in my Spam Folder. I was wondering who else got tagged.
Schteveo
I thought you might like to know some reasons why you are not getting enough Social Media and Organic search engine traffic for Anniesinferno.blogspot.com.
1. Your website Anniesinferno.blogspot.com is not ranking top in Google organic searches for many competitive keyword phrases.
2. Your company is not doing well in most of the Social Media Websites.
3. Your site is not user friendly on mobile devices.
There are many additional improvements that could be made to your website, and if you would like to learn about them, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with a detailed analysis in the form of a WEBSITE AUDIT REPORT for FREE.
Our clients consistently tell us that their customers find them because they are at the top of the Google search rankings. Being at the top left of Google (#1- #3 organic positions) is the best thing you can do for your company's website traffic and online reputation. You will be happy to know that, my team is willing to guarantee you 1st page Google ranking for most of your targeted keyword phrases in our six month ongoing campaign.
Sound interesting? Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide me with your phone number and the best time to call you. I am also available to meet you in person and present you this website audit report.
------------------------------ ------------------------------ -----
Best Regards,
Chloe Lee
Marketing Consultant
SEO Analyst
(315)-895-1453
PS I: I am not spamming. I have studied your website and believe I can help with your business promotion. If you still want us to not contact you, you can ignore this email or ask to remove and I will not contact again.
______________________________________________________________________________
I got this in my e-mail today, straight in, not in my Spam Folder. I was wondering who else got tagged.
Schteveo
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
The same thing all over again
So here we go again. Another mass shooting has taken place. I wonder if anyone of the people of whom I disagree with, politically, nearly 99% of the time is ever going to notice a common thread?
that being....the mass shootings always seem to take place in a target rich environment where the people have been disarmed!!!
Washington D. C. one of the 3 most restrictive places in this country to possess a gun. A major crime perpetrated by....a stereotype.
I wonder if they are ever going to notice that stereotypes usually have a nugget of truth to them?
Now I am going to stop thinking and just sits for a while.
that being....the mass shootings always seem to take place in a target rich environment where the people have been disarmed!!!
Washington D. C. one of the 3 most restrictive places in this country to possess a gun. A major crime perpetrated by....a stereotype.
I wonder if they are ever going to notice that stereotypes usually have a nugget of truth to them?
Now I am going to stop thinking and just sits for a while.
Sunday, September 15, 2013
What Were 2+ BILLION Rounds For?
As we all know, it was impossible for gun owners/shooters to buy ammo last year, and the prices for the few rounds that were available were astronomical. Then, word leaked out that (the govt.) had purchased and/or ordered "over 2 Billion rounds " of ammo, almost all of hit Hollow Point handgun ammo. We then found out that the same govt. also ordered "hundreds of full-auto rifles " for their agents. There were also dozens and dozens of armored cars. And we all said the same thing, WTF?
Well, it seems that this Marxist govt. has far more "agents" than anyone can explain, and they're in agencies that (should not) be heavily armed, or armed at all. But they are. Is America becoming a police state, or, has it already become a police state?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/armed-epa-agents-in-alaska-shed-light-on-70-fed-agencies-with-armed-divisions/?intcmp=HPBucket
Well, it seems that this Marxist govt. has far more "agents" than anyone can explain, and they're in agencies that (should not) be heavily armed, or armed at all. But they are. Is America becoming a police state, or, has it already become a police state?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/09/14/armed-epa-agents-in-alaska-shed-light-on-70-fed-agencies-with-armed-divisions/?intcmp=HPBucket
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
Sobering (and scary) Facts
A new analysis of federal health data shows that Medicaid paid for nearly half of all births in the United States in 2010, a rate that continues to increase.In part this trend results from the incremental imposition of socialized medicine. In part it results from the demographic aspect of America’s fundamental transformation:
The federal health care program covered 48 percent of the 3.8 million births that year, jumping from 40 percent in 2008, say researchers from the George Washington University School of Public Health. In only two years, the government entitlement covered 90,000 more women giving birth, as states expand the federal-state health coverage plan.
In New York City in 2009, 76% of Hispanic births were covered by Medicaid, 70% of births in the black community were covered, and 31% of whites. As an ever-higher percentage of the population is literally born into government dependence, the correspondingly shrinking percentage of those who pull the cart instead of ride in it will have to pull ever harder. Taxes will soar, as the standard of living declines. Memories of America’s greatness will fade into collectivist oblivion.
It would have been easier to resist at the beginning. Soon, resistance will be inconceivable. You can’t defend a country that no longer exists...
Saturday, September 7, 2013
Things To Think About
Think about it:
As I hurtled through space, one thought kept crossing my mind - every part of this rocket was supplied by the lowest bidder... – John Glenn
America is the only country where a significant proportion of the population believes that professional wrestling is real but the moon landing was faked... – David Letterman
I'm not a paranoid, deranged millionaire, God dammit, I'm a billionaire.
– Howard Hughes
After the game, the King and the Pawn go into the same box... – Italian proverb
Men are like linoleum floors. Lay 'em right and you can walk all over them for thirty years.
– Betsy Salkkind
The only reason they say 'Women and children first' is to test the strength of the lifeboats.
– Jean Kerr
I've been married to a communist and a fascist, and neither would take out the garbage.
– Zsa Zsa Gabor
You know you're a redneck if your home has wheels and your car doesn't.
– Jeff Foxworthy
When a man opens a car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new wife.
– Prince Philip
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kickboxing.
– Emo Philips
Wood burns faster when you have to cut and chop it yourself... – Harrison Ford
The best cure for sea sickness, is to sit under a tree... – Spike Milligan
Lawyers believe a man is innocent until proven broke... – Robin Hall
Kill one man and you're a murderer, kill a million and you're a conqueror.
– Jean Rostand
Having more money doesn't make you happier. I have 50 million dollars but I'm just as happy as when I had 48 million... – Arnold Schwarzenegger
We are here on earth to do good unto others. What the others are here for, I have no idea.
– W.H. Auden
In hotel rooms I worry. I can't be the only guy who sits on the furniture naked.
– Jonathan Katz
If life were fair, Elvis would still be alive today and all the impersonators would be dead.
– Johnny Carson
I don't believe in astrology. I am a Sagittarius and we're very skeptical.
– Arthur C Clarke
Hollywood must be the only place on earth where you can be fired by a man wearing a Hawaiian shirt and a baseball cap... – Steve Martin
As I hurtled through space, one thought kept crossing my mind - every part of this rocket was supplied by the lowest bidder... – John Glenn
America is the only country where a significant proportion of the population believes that professional wrestling is real but the moon landing was faked... – David Letterman
I'm not a paranoid, deranged millionaire, God dammit, I'm a billionaire.
– Howard Hughes
After the game, the King and the Pawn go into the same box... – Italian proverb
Men are like linoleum floors. Lay 'em right and you can walk all over them for thirty years.
– Betsy Salkkind
The only reason they say 'Women and children first' is to test the strength of the lifeboats.
– Jean Kerr
I've been married to a communist and a fascist, and neither would take out the garbage.
– Zsa Zsa Gabor
You know you're a redneck if your home has wheels and your car doesn't.
– Jeff Foxworthy
When a man opens a car door for his wife, it's either a new car or a new wife.
– Prince Philip
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kickboxing.
– Emo Philips
Wood burns faster when you have to cut and chop it yourself... – Harrison Ford
The best cure for sea sickness, is to sit under a tree... – Spike Milligan
Lawyers believe a man is innocent until proven broke... – Robin Hall
Kill one man and you're a murderer, kill a million and you're a conqueror.
– Jean Rostand
Having more money doesn't make you happier. I have 50 million dollars but I'm just as happy as when I had 48 million... – Arnold Schwarzenegger
We are here on earth to do good unto others. What the others are here for, I have no idea.
– W.H. Auden
In hotel rooms I worry. I can't be the only guy who sits on the furniture naked.
– Jonathan Katz
If life were fair, Elvis would still be alive today and all the impersonators would be dead.
– Johnny Carson
I don't believe in astrology. I am a Sagittarius and we're very skeptical.
– Arthur C Clarke
Hollywood must be the only place on earth where you can be fired by a man wearing a Hawaiian shirt and a baseball cap... – Steve Martin
Thursday, September 5, 2013
The G20, the BBC, and media verbiage...
So I'm watching the news this morning. And the big story on the BBC was the G20. And the big story OF that story, was the leaders of the G20 changing Tax Laws worldwide, so that corporations can't move profits around to keep their money.
OK, I understand that.
But what pissed me off, was the verbiage used in the story. They kept using terms like "tax dodging", "tax cheating", and even "tax evasion". THEN, the financial guy went on to say the G20 countries are doing this in concert, because they NEED the money.
They went on to point out that countries like Ireland, who have rebounded over the last decade because of their TAX FRIENDLY attitudes, will mostly likely be 'irrevocably damaged'. But this WILL benefit Third World countries, mostly in Africa (HUH?) because profits moving around and being spent, will always help the little guys. (HUH?!?!!!)
There is SO much here that's wrong headed that it's hard to cover it all without writing a book.
First and foremost, WHY is it that profits will trickle down to AFRICAN countries when profits get moved around and tax laws change? But it won't work that way in AMERICA when the same tax changes are suggested here? Here's some verbiage I like.
Hypocritical Jerks!
But the short of it, is that companies moving money is a system the governments SET UP, trying to out wit and beat each other in an attempt to GET more companies into their tax areas by lowering taxes, thus getting a little less up front, but getting that little bit less, from MORE companies on the back end, hoping to fill the coffers!
Companies cheating, evading and dodging didn't used to happen, not like it does now, according to the Beeb finance guys anyway. But the companies are ONLY doing what the G20 countries set up in the first place, trying to steal business from each other. So how is it then, that the companies are doing anything wrong? IMHO, if it's LEGAL, it's not cheating, evading nor dodging! Those are words you use for ILLEGAL operations, not systems of international business, set up BY the same idiots, who are now complaining about it.
But the true BS in ALL of this is the word "NEED".
If there is a country in the G20, who has a 'need' for the money, I don't know WHO it is. The group of them are ruining the world economy, not because they have an unmet 'NEED', but because they have stupid, unending, self-serving SPENDING. And their answer to filling the gap, is to have the companies, GIVE them the profits they worked for. Which means taking it from the stock holders and employees, which usually means lay-offs and unemployment and problems passed BACK to the guys who created the problems.
The governments of the G20 Nations. And what an insufferable bunch of idiot assholes they are!
.
.
Schteveo
OK, I understand that.
But what pissed me off, was the verbiage used in the story. They kept using terms like "tax dodging", "tax cheating", and even "tax evasion". THEN, the financial guy went on to say the G20 countries are doing this in concert, because they NEED the money.
They went on to point out that countries like Ireland, who have rebounded over the last decade because of their TAX FRIENDLY attitudes, will mostly likely be 'irrevocably damaged'. But this WILL benefit Third World countries, mostly in Africa (HUH?) because profits moving around and being spent, will always help the little guys. (HUH?!?!!!)
There is SO much here that's wrong headed that it's hard to cover it all without writing a book.
First and foremost, WHY is it that profits will trickle down to AFRICAN countries when profits get moved around and tax laws change? But it won't work that way in AMERICA when the same tax changes are suggested here? Here's some verbiage I like.
Hypocritical Jerks!
But the short of it, is that companies moving money is a system the governments SET UP, trying to out wit and beat each other in an attempt to GET more companies into their tax areas by lowering taxes, thus getting a little less up front, but getting that little bit less, from MORE companies on the back end, hoping to fill the coffers!
Companies cheating, evading and dodging didn't used to happen, not like it does now, according to the Beeb finance guys anyway. But the companies are ONLY doing what the G20 countries set up in the first place, trying to steal business from each other. So how is it then, that the companies are doing anything wrong? IMHO, if it's LEGAL, it's not cheating, evading nor dodging! Those are words you use for ILLEGAL operations, not systems of international business, set up BY the same idiots, who are now complaining about it.
But the true BS in ALL of this is the word "NEED".
If there is a country in the G20, who has a 'need' for the money, I don't know WHO it is. The group of them are ruining the world economy, not because they have an unmet 'NEED', but because they have stupid, unending, self-serving SPENDING. And their answer to filling the gap, is to have the companies, GIVE them the profits they worked for. Which means taking it from the stock holders and employees, which usually means lay-offs and unemployment and problems passed BACK to the guys who created the problems.
The governments of the G20 Nations. And what an insufferable bunch of idiot assholes they are!
.
.
Schteveo
Sunday, September 1, 2013
Is this the End of the DEA and Mexican Cartels?
It's legal to light up in Colorado
and Washington, and soon smoking pot could be legalized across the
country following a decision Thursday by the federal government.
After Washington state and Colorado passed laws in November 2012 legalizing the consumption and sale of marijuana for adults over 18, lawmakers in both states waited to see whether the federal government would continue to prosecute pot crimes under federal statutes in their states.
Both Colorado and Washington have been working to set up regulatory systems in order to license and tax marijuana growers and retail sellers, but have been wary of whether federal prosecutors would come after them for doing so. They are the first states to legalize pot, and therefore to go through the process of trying to set up a regulatory system.
But on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced that it would not prosecute marijuana crimes that were legal under state law, a move that could signal the end of the country's longtime prohibition on pot is nearing. "It certainly appears to be potentially the beginning of the end," said Paul Armantano, deputy director of the pot lobby group NORML.
.
.
If they did this here, I'd probably buy some, but I can't see me, or most people, quitting their job to stay home and watch TPIR, with a Tommy Chong Bong in their lap. Hell, I've got 3 beers left over from a 6 pack from the 4th of July! Most of America drinks socially, they likewise, smoke or snort socially.
We'd see more people smoking a bowl, drinking two less beers, eating half a bag of chips, 4 or 5 cookies, some toast, some...SOUP...oh HELL yeah, tomato soup! Then they go to sleep, and get up after 9 or 10 hours of sleep [they started smoking as soon as they got HOME!!], they'd be well ready for work.
How is that a bad thing?
So the DEA going away and the Me's'ican Cartels going away isn't a bad thing. Maybe they can use all those billions the DEA pisses away, on something worthwhile. That's pretty funny, right?
Next I'll tell you a Knock Knock Joke.
.
.
Schteveo
After Washington state and Colorado passed laws in November 2012 legalizing the consumption and sale of marijuana for adults over 18, lawmakers in both states waited to see whether the federal government would continue to prosecute pot crimes under federal statutes in their states.
Both Colorado and Washington have been working to set up regulatory systems in order to license and tax marijuana growers and retail sellers, but have been wary of whether federal prosecutors would come after them for doing so. They are the first states to legalize pot, and therefore to go through the process of trying to set up a regulatory system.
But on Thursday, the Department of Justice announced that it would not prosecute marijuana crimes that were legal under state law, a move that could signal the end of the country's longtime prohibition on pot is nearing. "It certainly appears to be potentially the beginning of the end," said Paul Armantano, deputy director of the pot lobby group NORML.
.
.
If they did this here, I'd probably buy some, but I can't see me, or most people, quitting their job to stay home and watch TPIR, with a Tommy Chong Bong in their lap. Hell, I've got 3 beers left over from a 6 pack from the 4th of July! Most of America drinks socially, they likewise, smoke or snort socially.
We'd see more people smoking a bowl, drinking two less beers, eating half a bag of chips, 4 or 5 cookies, some toast, some...SOUP...oh HELL yeah, tomato soup! Then they go to sleep, and get up after 9 or 10 hours of sleep [they started smoking as soon as they got HOME!!], they'd be well ready for work.
How is that a bad thing?
So the DEA going away and the Me's'ican Cartels going away isn't a bad thing. Maybe they can use all those billions the DEA pisses away, on something worthwhile. That's pretty funny, right?
Next I'll tell you a Knock Knock Joke.
.
.
Schteveo
Saturday, August 31, 2013
How To Get Even
(Yahoo News) These days, Lee Beaumont is perfectly happy to get a call
from a telemarketer. In fact, he's the one making a profit from the
unsolicited sales calls. The BBC reports that Beaumont became so sick of
getting calls from marketing companies that he changed his phone number
settings so that incoming callers have to pay him a small fee to
connect.
Since changing his number in November 2011, Beaumont says he's made about 300 pounds ($464) from the calls. Using a service called PhonepayPlus, Beaumont charges incoming callers 10 pence to connect and additional charges for the longer he stays on the line.
"Because I'm getting annoyed with PPI phone calls when I'm trying to watch Coronation Street so I'd rather make 10p a minute," he told the BBC. "I want cold calls."
Beaumont receives 70 percent of the take from such calls, adding that he now goes out of his way to keep telemarketers on the line for longer periods of time. Beaumont says he fully discloses the charges when companies ask for his number. The "0871" line does raise some eyebrows with company representatives, but many still elect to pay for the chance to make a sale. PhonepayPlus, the company Beaumont enlisted for his pay-to-call numbers, said it discourages individuals from setting up similar lines. "Premium rate numbers are not designed to be used in this way and we would strongly discourage any listeners from adopting this idea, as they will be liable under our code for any breaches and subsequent fines that result," the company told the BBC.
For his part, Beaumont said he keeps a separate, private number for personal calls.
"I don't use my normal Leeds number for anyone but my friends and family," he told the BBC.
There are various options for setting up similar pay lines in the U.S., although most are targeted to individuals setting up a small business for ventures such as psychic lines or adult chats. Skype used to offer a service called Skype Prime, which allowed it to charge for incoming calls but that service has since been discontinued.
The Federal Communications Commission has established guidelines regarding "900" numbers in the U.S., but those rules seem to provide wiggle room for anyone who wants to follow Beaumont's lead as long as they are doing so transparently...
Since changing his number in November 2011, Beaumont says he's made about 300 pounds ($464) from the calls. Using a service called PhonepayPlus, Beaumont charges incoming callers 10 pence to connect and additional charges for the longer he stays on the line.
"Because I'm getting annoyed with PPI phone calls when I'm trying to watch Coronation Street so I'd rather make 10p a minute," he told the BBC. "I want cold calls."
Beaumont receives 70 percent of the take from such calls, adding that he now goes out of his way to keep telemarketers on the line for longer periods of time. Beaumont says he fully discloses the charges when companies ask for his number. The "0871" line does raise some eyebrows with company representatives, but many still elect to pay for the chance to make a sale. PhonepayPlus, the company Beaumont enlisted for his pay-to-call numbers, said it discourages individuals from setting up similar lines. "Premium rate numbers are not designed to be used in this way and we would strongly discourage any listeners from adopting this idea, as they will be liable under our code for any breaches and subsequent fines that result," the company told the BBC.
For his part, Beaumont said he keeps a separate, private number for personal calls.
"I don't use my normal Leeds number for anyone but my friends and family," he told the BBC.
There are various options for setting up similar pay lines in the U.S., although most are targeted to individuals setting up a small business for ventures such as psychic lines or adult chats. Skype used to offer a service called Skype Prime, which allowed it to charge for incoming calls but that service has since been discontinued.
The Federal Communications Commission has established guidelines regarding "900" numbers in the U.S., but those rules seem to provide wiggle room for anyone who wants to follow Beaumont's lead as long as they are doing so transparently...
Wednesday, August 28, 2013
MY Tax Dollars at work, educating the youth of NC...and the World at Large
Many people know I am NOT a fan of current residential State. For lack of any other reason, the place is schizophrenic. WHY would generally decent, God fearing, Christian, Moderates CONTINUALLY vote for ever more Liberal Democrats, right up to the point where our last Governor was metaphorically under Obama's desk, holding his 'cigar', and some of her Cabinet now work in D.C. for that idiot.
Our greatest gift to the world at large however, and by 'our' I include myself ONLY as a NC Taxpayer, our greatest gift is the greater UNC University System. A group of 17 colleges and universities guaranteeing that Karl Marx is alive and well, and living in the hearts of graduates and attendees of the UNC System. Being a good communist institution, they also seek to undermine anything wholesome or clean.
There are damned few Conservative professors in America, fewer still in the UNC schools. So few in fact, that one of them was recently called out for BEING a Conservative, and for speaking his mind on Conservative topics, and for saying Marriage should be for ONE man and ONE woman. One person went so far as to call him "an embarrassment to higher education in America".
Dr. Adams answer to this tick turd is a classic.
.
Dear Edward:
I want to take the time to thank you for writing and telling me that I should be fired from my position as a tenured professor because I am “the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America.” I also want to thank you for responding when I asked you exactly how you arrived at that conclusion. Your response, “because you insist that marriage requires one man and one woman,” was both helpful and concise.
While I respect your right to conclude that I am the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America, I think you’re wrong. In fact, I don’t even think I’m the biggest embarrassment to higher education in the state of North Carolina. But since you’re a liberal and you support “choice” – provided we’re talking about dismembering children and not school vouchers for those who weren’t dismembered – I want to give you some options. In fact, I’m going to describe the antics of ten professors, official campus groups, and invited campus speakers in North Carolina and let you decide which constitutes the biggest embarrassment to higher education.
1. In the early spring semester of 2013, a women’s studies professor and a psychology professor at Western Carolina University co-sponsored a panel on bondage and S&M. The purpose of the panel was to teach college students how to inflict pain on themselves and others for sexual pleasure. When you called me the biggest embarrassment in higher education, you must not have known about their bondage panel. Maybe you were tied up that evening and couldn’t make it.
2. At UNC Chapel Hill, there is a feminist professor who believes that women can lead happy lives without men. That’s nothing new. But what’s different is that she thinks women can form lifelong domestic partnerships with dogs and that those relationships will actually be fulfilling enough to replace marital relationships with men. I can’t make this stuff up, Ed. I don’t drop acid. Well, at least not since the late 1980s. But I promise this story is real and not an LSD flashback.
3. At Duke University, feminists hired a “sex worker” (read: prostitute) to speak as part of an event called the Sex Workers Art Show. After his speech, the male prostitute pulled down his pants, got down on his knees, and inserted a burning sparkler into his rectum. While it burned, he sang a verse of “the Star Spangled Banner.” I believe that stripping incident was almost as embarrassing as the other one involving the Duke Lacrosse team.
There are 7 more examples, each one, more lurid than the last, go read them, it's quite enlightening. And just for the record, I hate here just a liiiitle more here now. Texas looks better allllll the time.
.
.
Schteveo
Our greatest gift to the world at large however, and by 'our' I include myself ONLY as a NC Taxpayer, our greatest gift is the greater UNC University System. A group of 17 colleges and universities guaranteeing that Karl Marx is alive and well, and living in the hearts of graduates and attendees of the UNC System. Being a good communist institution, they also seek to undermine anything wholesome or clean.
There are damned few Conservative professors in America, fewer still in the UNC schools. So few in fact, that one of them was recently called out for BEING a Conservative, and for speaking his mind on Conservative topics, and for saying Marriage should be for ONE man and ONE woman. One person went so far as to call him "an embarrassment to higher education in America".
Dr. Adams answer to this tick turd is a classic.
.
Dear Edward:
I want to take the time to thank you for writing and telling me that I should be fired from my position as a tenured professor because I am “the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America.” I also want to thank you for responding when I asked you exactly how you arrived at that conclusion. Your response, “because you insist that marriage requires one man and one woman,” was both helpful and concise.
While I respect your right to conclude that I am the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America, I think you’re wrong. In fact, I don’t even think I’m the biggest embarrassment to higher education in the state of North Carolina. But since you’re a liberal and you support “choice” – provided we’re talking about dismembering children and not school vouchers for those who weren’t dismembered – I want to give you some options. In fact, I’m going to describe the antics of ten professors, official campus groups, and invited campus speakers in North Carolina and let you decide which constitutes the biggest embarrassment to higher education.
1. In the early spring semester of 2013, a women’s studies professor and a psychology professor at Western Carolina University co-sponsored a panel on bondage and S&M. The purpose of the panel was to teach college students how to inflict pain on themselves and others for sexual pleasure. When you called me the biggest embarrassment in higher education, you must not have known about their bondage panel. Maybe you were tied up that evening and couldn’t make it.
2. At UNC Chapel Hill, there is a feminist professor who believes that women can lead happy lives without men. That’s nothing new. But what’s different is that she thinks women can form lifelong domestic partnerships with dogs and that those relationships will actually be fulfilling enough to replace marital relationships with men. I can’t make this stuff up, Ed. I don’t drop acid. Well, at least not since the late 1980s. But I promise this story is real and not an LSD flashback.
3. At Duke University, feminists hired a “sex worker” (read: prostitute) to speak as part of an event called the Sex Workers Art Show. After his speech, the male prostitute pulled down his pants, got down on his knees, and inserted a burning sparkler into his rectum. While it burned, he sang a verse of “the Star Spangled Banner.” I believe that stripping incident was almost as embarrassing as the other one involving the Duke Lacrosse team.
“the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America.”
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
“the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America.”
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
“the biggest embarrassment to higher education in America.”
Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
.Read more at http://clashdaily.com/2013/08/an-embarrassment-to-higher-education/#Of8yifxlg0yKPL3E.99
There are 7 more examples, each one, more lurid than the last, go read them, it's quite enlightening. And just for the record, I hate here just a liiiitle more here now. Texas looks better allllll the time.
.
.
Schteveo
Monday, August 19, 2013
So, What Do You Think?
We know that no treaty is applicable unless first ratified by congress. We also know how many times the Marxist-in-Chief has ignored and bypassed congress. And we should know that a ratified treaty has more force in law that a Constitutional amendment...
From this global perspective, the UN's International Small Arms Control Standard module then directs, in excruciating detail, the manner in which national governments should restrict access to firearms and ammunition:
Restricting civilian possession of firearms only to those "at the lowest risk of misusing them."
Limiting sales and other transfers of firearms only to commercial transactions at licensed "sales premises" (in other words, no transfers at gun shows).
Only persons licensed and periodically relicensed by the national government could possess firearms.
All firearms must be registered with the national government.
All persons wishing to possess a firearm must pass a rigorous exam administered by the national government.
All firearms must be stored in locked containers separate from ammunition, and "bolted to a heavy or immovable object."
Only a predetermined number of firearms and rounds of ammunition may be possessed by a "properly" licensed civilian.
Magazine capacity is limited to 10 rounds.
Possession of a firearm may only occur after a seven-day waiting period.
No civilian could own or possess a firearm for self-defense unless he first demonstrates a "clear and convincing" need.
Individuals licensed to own firearms "are subject to periodic and random inspections of their homes or businesses".
In order to be granted a license to possess a firearm, an individual must secure recommendations from "responsible members of society," attesting to their "suitability to possess a small arm."
From this global perspective, the UN's International Small Arms Control Standard module then directs, in excruciating detail, the manner in which national governments should restrict access to firearms and ammunition:
Restricting civilian possession of firearms only to those "at the lowest risk of misusing them."
Limiting sales and other transfers of firearms only to commercial transactions at licensed "sales premises" (in other words, no transfers at gun shows).
Only persons licensed and periodically relicensed by the national government could possess firearms.
All firearms must be registered with the national government.
All persons wishing to possess a firearm must pass a rigorous exam administered by the national government.
All firearms must be stored in locked containers separate from ammunition, and "bolted to a heavy or immovable object."
Only a predetermined number of firearms and rounds of ammunition may be possessed by a "properly" licensed civilian.
Magazine capacity is limited to 10 rounds.
Possession of a firearm may only occur after a seven-day waiting period.
No civilian could own or possess a firearm for self-defense unless he first demonstrates a "clear and convincing" need.
Individuals licensed to own firearms "are subject to periodic and random inspections of their homes or businesses".
In order to be granted a license to possess a firearm, an individual must secure recommendations from "responsible members of society," attesting to their "suitability to possess a small arm."
Robert Anson Heinlein is Right, yet again
If it were NOT for Robert A. Heinlein, I'd be yet another slack jawed yokel, non-reading, sheet rock hanging or wrench turning, know nothing idgit! But because a Librarian stuck a copy of "Red Planet" in my hand, thus lighting the fire of READING in me, I became the reasonably well read, autodidact [look it up!] that I am.
I certainly AM one of Heinlein's Kids.
I've read everything Heinlein ever wrote. In many of his adult novels he wrote about the concept of 'term marriages', some short term, some long term. It was designed to be a renewable marriage contract that would allow people to move on, if they so desired. Well, kids, it's no longer the pervue of fiction.
A high divorce rate means it's time to try 'wedleases'
We all know that far too many marriages end in divorce, yet this institution does not adapt. Indeed, most Americans today want to expand conventional marriage to include same-sex couples.
So why is there no effort to improve the legal structure of marriage, when it shows itself to be deficient?
Marriage is a legal partnership that lasts a lifetime — one lifetime to be exact, that of the first of the spouses to die. Generally speaking, that is a long time for any partnership. People, circumstances and all sorts of other things change. The compatibility of any two people over decades may decline with these changes to the point of extinction.
In real estate, one may own a life estate in a piece of property. This is comparable to the term of a marriage — a lifetime. And in real estate, one may hold possession of property for shorter terms through a lease.
Why don't we borrow from real estate and create a marital lease? Instead of wedlock, a "wedlease."
Here's how a marital lease could work: Two people commit themselves to marriage for a period of years — one year, five years, 10 years, whatever term suits them. The marital lease could be renewed at the end of the term however many times a couple likes. It could end up lasting a lifetime if the relationship is good and worth continuing. But if the relationship is bad, the couple could go their separate ways at the end of the term. The messiness of divorce is avoided, and the end can be as simple as vacating a rental unit.
A marital lease could describe the property of the spouses in detail, so separate ownership is clear. If a couple wishes to buy something together, or share ownership, they can keep a schedule of these items and decide as they go along how these would be disposed of in the event of a partner's death or if they do not renew their wedlease. Landlords and tenants have proved the effectiveness of making clear their separate property and its disposition at the end of property leases.
If the couple has a child, there could be an option to have the lease automatically continue until the child reaches the age of majority. Of course, relationships change with family additions, and an extended term may not be feasible. But considering the number of children born out of wedlock these days, would it not be better for parents to at least commit to a wedlease, even if it doesn't last a lifetime?
Heinlein's systems of marriage ALWAYS provided for the CHILDREN first and foremost. A system, might I add, that doesn't always exist in our country at present. Many of the people I know who get divorced are MUCH more worried about the $$$ than they are the kids!
I have to tell you, given the ME, ME, ME attitude, 'Term Marriages' are the way to go. The caveat being, ANYONE who is in a 'Term Marriage', should be barred from having children.
.
.
Schteveo
I certainly AM one of Heinlein's Kids.
I've read everything Heinlein ever wrote. In many of his adult novels he wrote about the concept of 'term marriages', some short term, some long term. It was designed to be a renewable marriage contract that would allow people to move on, if they so desired. Well, kids, it's no longer the pervue of fiction.
A high divorce rate means it's time to try 'wedleases'
We all know that far too many marriages end in divorce, yet this institution does not adapt. Indeed, most Americans today want to expand conventional marriage to include same-sex couples.
So why is there no effort to improve the legal structure of marriage, when it shows itself to be deficient?
Marriage is a legal partnership that lasts a lifetime — one lifetime to be exact, that of the first of the spouses to die. Generally speaking, that is a long time for any partnership. People, circumstances and all sorts of other things change. The compatibility of any two people over decades may decline with these changes to the point of extinction.
In real estate, one may own a life estate in a piece of property. This is comparable to the term of a marriage — a lifetime. And in real estate, one may hold possession of property for shorter terms through a lease.
Why don't we borrow from real estate and create a marital lease? Instead of wedlock, a "wedlease."
Here's how a marital lease could work: Two people commit themselves to marriage for a period of years — one year, five years, 10 years, whatever term suits them. The marital lease could be renewed at the end of the term however many times a couple likes. It could end up lasting a lifetime if the relationship is good and worth continuing. But if the relationship is bad, the couple could go their separate ways at the end of the term. The messiness of divorce is avoided, and the end can be as simple as vacating a rental unit.
A marital lease could describe the property of the spouses in detail, so separate ownership is clear. If a couple wishes to buy something together, or share ownership, they can keep a schedule of these items and decide as they go along how these would be disposed of in the event of a partner's death or if they do not renew their wedlease. Landlords and tenants have proved the effectiveness of making clear their separate property and its disposition at the end of property leases.
If the couple has a child, there could be an option to have the lease automatically continue until the child reaches the age of majority. Of course, relationships change with family additions, and an extended term may not be feasible. But considering the number of children born out of wedlock these days, would it not be better for parents to at least commit to a wedlease, even if it doesn't last a lifetime?
Heinlein's systems of marriage ALWAYS provided for the CHILDREN first and foremost. A system, might I add, that doesn't always exist in our country at present. Many of the people I know who get divorced are MUCH more worried about the $$$ than they are the kids!
I have to tell you, given the ME, ME, ME attitude, 'Term Marriages' are the way to go. The caveat being, ANYONE who is in a 'Term Marriage', should be barred from having children.
.
.
Schteveo
Friday, August 16, 2013
no systematic evidence
So the White crib is saying: "no systematic evidence that the Affordable Care Act is having an adverse impact on job growth or the number of hours employees are working"
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/16/republicans-rebut-obama-claim-that-have-no-obamacare-alternatives/#ixzz2cAtRVdHA
so can someone please tell me why my wife just got a letter in the mail stating that if she exceeds 29.5 hours during any week, the company would have no option other than to terminate her employment?
Funny thing is, up until a couple days ago, we didn't care about health care benefits from her employment because as a military retiree we could get Tricare or Tricare Prime. Except today we got a letter in the mail stating that effective October 1, 2013 we would no longer be covered by Tricare Prime since I am not disabled, under age 65 and might be able to get a job that provides healthcare benefits......the key word there is "might" Reality....I have a full time job as a government contractor...except I've been furloughed 6 out of 8 weeks since March. And my part time job as a substitute high school teacher, $65 per day, has no benefits.
things that make you go.....Hmmmmm?
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/16/republicans-rebut-obama-claim-that-have-no-obamacare-alternatives/#ixzz2cAtRVdHA
so can someone please tell me why my wife just got a letter in the mail stating that if she exceeds 29.5 hours during any week, the company would have no option other than to terminate her employment?
Funny thing is, up until a couple days ago, we didn't care about health care benefits from her employment because as a military retiree we could get Tricare or Tricare Prime. Except today we got a letter in the mail stating that effective October 1, 2013 we would no longer be covered by Tricare Prime since I am not disabled, under age 65 and might be able to get a job that provides healthcare benefits......the key word there is "might" Reality....I have a full time job as a government contractor...except I've been furloughed 6 out of 8 weeks since March. And my part time job as a substitute high school teacher, $65 per day, has no benefits.
things that make you go.....Hmmmmm?
Thursday, August 15, 2013
The Cost of "Free Healthcare"
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason.”
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3vuAa60
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
"Any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason..."Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
And who are the "high-risk" groups who will be susceptible to these "visits"?
Families where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental delays, or disabilities.
Families who have members who (are serving, or have served in the armed forces, including families who have members who have served multiple deployments outside the US.)
Can you see congress quietly adding an amendment to include gun owners?
Families
where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental
delays, or disabilities.
Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the
armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed
forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3wUj0wS
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost any reason.”
Read more: http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3vhXlMI
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ShGm58sFWWrzv7sm.99
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost
any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be
targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be
targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental
delays, or disabilities.
Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the
armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed
forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3v4gdkD
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost
any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be
targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be
targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental
delays, or disabilities.
Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the
armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed
forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3v4gdkD
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost
any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be
targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be
targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental
delays, or disabilities.
Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the
armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed
forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3v4gdkD
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
“Clearly, any family may be visited by federally paid agents for almost
any reason.”
According to an Obamacare provision millions of Americans will be
targeted.
The Health and Human Services’ website states that your family will be
targeted if you fall under the “high-risk” categories below:
Families where mom is not yet 21.
Families where someone is a tobacco user.
Families where children have low student achievement, developmental
delays, or disabilities.
Families with individuals who are serving or formerly served in the
armed forces, including such families that have members of the armed
forces who have had multiple deployments outside the United States.
Read more:
http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#ixzz2c3v4gdkD
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/08/obamacare-provision-forced-home-inspections/#Fgd8T4bY1IsOculp.99
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Top Ten List of American Stupidity
10) Only in America ... could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign diner.
9) Only in America ... could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America ... could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
7) Only in America ... can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
6) Only in America ... would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.
5) Only in America ... could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
4) Only in America ... could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America ... could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
2) Only in America ... could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
1) Only in America ... could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.
9) Only in America ... could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General and roughly 20% of the federal workforce is black while only 14% of the population is black. 40+% of all federal entitlements goes to black Americans - 3X the rate that go to whites, 5X the rate that go to Hispanics!
8) Only in America ... could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner (the head of the Treasury Department) and Charles Rangel (who once ran the Ways and Means Committee), BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
7) Only in America ... can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
6) Only in America ... would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while they discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just 'magically' become American citizens.
5) Only in America ... could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
4) Only in America ... could you need to present a driver's license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
3) Only in America ... could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
2) Only in America ... could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year - for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
1) Only in America ... could the rich people - who pay 86% of all income taxes - be accused of not paying their "fair share" by people who don't pay any income taxes at all.
Monday, August 12, 2013
Art vs Racism. Who decides? Why, the LEFT, of course!!
Last year, the Lefty Hollywood types took a fairly life like GWB mask, stuffed it, put a great head of hair on it, and put it on a POLE, to look like a beheaded peasant or enemy soldier for the show "Game of Thrones". Naturally, many on the Right thought it was inappropriate to do that to a still living ex-POTUS.
We were told, at various times and by various people attached to HBO and "Game of Thrones", that it was (a) joke / oversight / ART, and it wasn't meant as disrespect.
Of course the question then, is this. IF it wasn't done on purpose, WHY use that particular mask? If it wasn't a jab, or suggestion for where top put the ACTUAL head of GWB, why not use a Clinton mask? Carter mask? JFK mask? FDR mask? WHY use a mask at all? OK then, let's say that I'll believe what you said about (a) joke / oversight / ART. And now, to show just how open minded and above reproach they are on the Left, I'll post THIS STORY.
The Missouri State Fair has permanently banned a rodeo clown whose imitation of President Barack Obama has been widely criticized as disrespectful.
Fair officials said Monday that the rodeo clown has been barred from ever performing at the fair again. They are also reviewing whether to take any actions against the contractor responsible for Saturday’s rodeo.
During the event, a clown wore a mask of Obama and asked the spectators if they wanted to see “Obama run down by a bull.” Many in the audience responded enthusiastically.
A rodeo announcer said he had no advance knowledge of the widely-criticized act and his attorney said the clown went rogue.
State Fair officials said in a statement Sunday that the act was “inappropriate” and “does not reflect the opinions or standards” of the fair. The Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association, which sponsored the event, also apologized in an online statement and said its board of directors “is dealing with the situation firmly and quickly as this type of behavior will not be tolerated.”
What the official statement should have said was
“...dealing with the situation firmly and quickly as this type of free speech will not be tolerated!”
So much for this guy's choices of (a) joke / ART right? I've YET to see anything from the rodeo clown, or to hear HIS side of wearing a mask, lampooning the clown at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Schteveo
Schteveo
We were told, at various times and by various people attached to HBO and "Game of Thrones", that it was (a) joke / oversight / ART, and it wasn't meant as disrespect.
Of course the question then, is this. IF it wasn't done on purpose, WHY use that particular mask? If it wasn't a jab, or suggestion for where top put the ACTUAL head of GWB, why not use a Clinton mask? Carter mask? JFK mask? FDR mask? WHY use a mask at all? OK then, let's say that I'll believe what you said about (a) joke / oversight / ART. And now, to show just how open minded and above reproach they are on the Left, I'll post THIS STORY.
The Missouri State Fair has permanently banned a rodeo clown whose imitation of President Barack Obama has been widely criticized as disrespectful.
Fair officials said Monday that the rodeo clown has been barred from ever performing at the fair again. They are also reviewing whether to take any actions against the contractor responsible for Saturday’s rodeo.
During the event, a clown wore a mask of Obama and asked the spectators if they wanted to see “Obama run down by a bull.” Many in the audience responded enthusiastically.
A rodeo announcer said he had no advance knowledge of the widely-criticized act and his attorney said the clown went rogue.
State Fair officials said in a statement Sunday that the act was “inappropriate” and “does not reflect the opinions or standards” of the fair. The Missouri Rodeo Cowboy Association, which sponsored the event, also apologized in an online statement and said its board of directors “is dealing with the situation firmly and quickly as this type of behavior will not be tolerated.”
What the official statement should have said was
“...dealing with the situation firmly and quickly as this type of free speech will not be tolerated!”
So much for this guy's choices of (a) joke / ART right? I've YET to see anything from the rodeo clown, or to hear HIS side of wearing a mask, lampooning the clown at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Schteveo
Schteveo
Friday, August 9, 2013
Start Packing, SOMEBODY'S got to move!
Three years ago I moved out of a county that was busing to achieve racial, and economic diversity. Before I moved I voted for a (R) led school board that wanted to do away with that system. And they won, overwhelmingly, primarily because even the po' folks livin' in da' PJ's were sick of their kids being bused an hour away, so the school board members and the NAACP leadership could feel better about themselves.
As usual the Leftists sued and tied up the plan in court long enough for a NEW school board to over turn that. THEY won primarily because the voters didn't have enough nerve to stand up to the Lefty crowd. I'm no longer living there, so I don't care. But HUD has a MUCH better plan for ALL of us, and we can go back to neighborhood schools. But some of you rich WHITE MFers are gonna have to move!
HUD Proposes Plan to Racially, Economically Integrate Neighborhoods
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed a new plan to change U.S. neighborhoods it says are racially imbalanced or are too tilted toward rich or poor, arguing the country's housing policies have not been effective at creating the kind of integrated communities the agency had hoped for.
Though details of how the policy would specifically work are unclear, the rule says HUD would provide states, local governments and others who receive agency money with data and a geospatial tool to look at "patterns of integration and segregation; racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty; access to education, employment, low-poverty, transportation, and environmental health."
States would then assess the best way to integrate communities deemed by HUD's data to not be integrated enough. A HUD official, who did not want to speak on record because of the public comment period, said the rule hopes to better match up HUD-assisted housing with the communities that have good hospitals, schools and other assets.
"It's not just having people of different colors live together just to do so," he says. "African-Americans and Latinos are more likely to live in segregated communities, that are predominantly lower income, have less strong public resources, less schools and educational opportunities, employment opportunities. This kind of integration strengthens economic equality."
.
So? Which of you is willing to uproot your family and move to a new house across the street for your town's toughest, drug infested, gang operated, gub'ment housing development? And I use the word 'willing' as a JOKE.
If they EVER got this approved, they'd be forcing us, or some of us, to move. And IF I'm not mistaken, that was a pretty standard way to operate, and is STILL the SOP, in Communist / Socialist run countries. Russia did it, NK does it, China does it, Cuba does it, they do it in HugoChavezland, seen it in Africa, Cambodia had a REALLY good plan for moving the people where the gov't wanted!!!
But those pesky intelectuals caused so much trouble, the kindly leaders were forced to kill several million of them.
Personally, I'm not moving, unless it's in a gov't approved, metal coffin, provided at their cost, carried by their minions. And I have the guns and ammo to prove my point. These SOB's have lost their GD minds!
.
.
Schteveo
As usual the Leftists sued and tied up the plan in court long enough for a NEW school board to over turn that. THEY won primarily because the voters didn't have enough nerve to stand up to the Lefty crowd. I'm no longer living there, so I don't care. But HUD has a MUCH better plan for ALL of us, and we can go back to neighborhood schools. But some of you rich WHITE MFers are gonna have to move!
HUD Proposes Plan to Racially, Economically Integrate Neighborhoods
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed a new plan to change U.S. neighborhoods it says are racially imbalanced or are too tilted toward rich or poor, arguing the country's housing policies have not been effective at creating the kind of integrated communities the agency had hoped for.
Though details of how the policy would specifically work are unclear, the rule says HUD would provide states, local governments and others who receive agency money with data and a geospatial tool to look at "patterns of integration and segregation; racially and ethnically concentrated areas of poverty; access to education, employment, low-poverty, transportation, and environmental health."
States would then assess the best way to integrate communities deemed by HUD's data to not be integrated enough. A HUD official, who did not want to speak on record because of the public comment period, said the rule hopes to better match up HUD-assisted housing with the communities that have good hospitals, schools and other assets.
"It's not just having people of different colors live together just to do so," he says. "African-Americans and Latinos are more likely to live in segregated communities, that are predominantly lower income, have less strong public resources, less schools and educational opportunities, employment opportunities. This kind of integration strengthens economic equality."
.
So? Which of you is willing to uproot your family and move to a new house across the street for your town's toughest, drug infested, gang operated, gub'ment housing development? And I use the word 'willing' as a JOKE.
If they EVER got this approved, they'd be forcing us, or some of us, to move. And IF I'm not mistaken, that was a pretty standard way to operate, and is STILL the SOP, in Communist / Socialist run countries. Russia did it, NK does it, China does it, Cuba does it, they do it in HugoChavezland, seen it in Africa, Cambodia had a REALLY good plan for moving the people where the gov't wanted!!!
But those pesky intelectuals caused so much trouble, the kindly leaders were forced to kill several million of them.
Personally, I'm not moving, unless it's in a gov't approved, metal coffin, provided at their cost, carried by their minions. And I have the guns and ammo to prove my point. These SOB's have lost their GD minds!
.
.
Schteveo
Friday Funny(s)
If cats and dogs didn't have fur would we still pet them?
If peanut butter cookies are made from peanut butter,
then what are Girl Scout cookies made out of?
If space is a vacuum, who changes the bags?
If swimming is good for your shape,
then why do the whales look the way they do?
If tin whistles are made out of tin, what do they make fog horns out of?
If white wine goes with fish, do white grapes go with sushi?
If you jog backwards, will you gain weight?
If you take an Oriental person and spin him around several times,
does he become disoriented?
Why do the signs that say "Slow Children" have a picture of a running child?
Why do they call it "chili" if it's hot?
Schteveo
If peanut butter cookies are made from peanut butter,
then what are Girl Scout cookies made out of?
If space is a vacuum, who changes the bags?
If swimming is good for your shape,
then why do the whales look the way they do?
If tin whistles are made out of tin, what do they make fog horns out of?
If white wine goes with fish, do white grapes go with sushi?
If you jog backwards, will you gain weight?
If you take an Oriental person and spin him around several times,
does he become disoriented?
Why do the signs that say "Slow Children" have a picture of a running child?
Why do they call it "chili" if it's hot?
Schteveo
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
HOW can they get SO MUCH, so WRONG, SO OFTEN!?
I watch a LOT of TV. But I watch H2, Science Channel, Discovery, etc. And I understand that the great majority of campus crawlers ARE lefty hand-wringers. But HOW can they get SO MUCH, SO wrong, SO OFTEN!?
The Leftist, Hand-Wringer, Idiotoid Point of View is killing the World.
I just watched, and screamed at, a show on Science Channel, called "Radioactive Paradise". It was about the 23 atomic / hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini Atoll. One of the things that the YOUNG Boomer-type scientists kept pounding on, was the radioactivity still at the Atoll. They also talked to, and about, islanders and veterans who have had cancer because of the radioactivity. They ignored the ignorance factor there and then. And they showed plenty of footage of Senior military people and civilians crawling all over the ships used as targets. It's not as if the JUST sent junior personnel out there, because they knew about the danger. We learned as we went, and like John Hammond in Crichton's "Jurassic Park", we often learn the hard lessons slowly and painfully. One of these boobs kept saying how negligent the U.S. was to 'ever' do air burst testing, underwater testing, and how negligent they were to USE THE BOMBS that won WWII in the first place.
Oddly enough, that mouthy MFer was GERMAN!
Hey, no irony there, huh? But beyond his opinion of U.S. testing and the radioactivity left over, and how the natives have not gotten to go home yet, he thinks the Atoll may stay radioactive forever, and the radioactive islands have caused ecological damage to the South Pacific. Hey, I'm sorry it happened too, but I'm NOT sorry we won the GD war!
I'll tell you what they NEVER addressed, WHY we built those test bombs, nor WHY we used 2 of the GDed things in 1945!!
Now I don't think these idiots are proponents of outright fascism, but why is it that they always prefer the robbing, raping, murdering of Fascists, Communists and Religious Fanatics running amok, to the use of the overt brute force needed to stay free? And they NEVER seem to know that INTELLECTUALS and college professors are invariably the first ones sent to concentration camps, gulags and the f*^king killing fields. So, I repeat my original question,
HOW can they get SO MUCH, SO wrong, SO OFTEN!?
.
.
Schteveo
The Leftist, Hand-Wringer, Idiotoid Point of View is killing the World.
I just watched, and screamed at, a show on Science Channel, called "Radioactive Paradise". It was about the 23 atomic / hydrogen bomb tests at Bikini Atoll. One of the things that the YOUNG Boomer-type scientists kept pounding on, was the radioactivity still at the Atoll. They also talked to, and about, islanders and veterans who have had cancer because of the radioactivity. They ignored the ignorance factor there and then. And they showed plenty of footage of Senior military people and civilians crawling all over the ships used as targets. It's not as if the JUST sent junior personnel out there, because they knew about the danger. We learned as we went, and like John Hammond in Crichton's "Jurassic Park", we often learn the hard lessons slowly and painfully. One of these boobs kept saying how negligent the U.S. was to 'ever' do air burst testing, underwater testing, and how negligent they were to USE THE BOMBS that won WWII in the first place.
Oddly enough, that mouthy MFer was GERMAN!
Hey, no irony there, huh? But beyond his opinion of U.S. testing and the radioactivity left over, and how the natives have not gotten to go home yet, he thinks the Atoll may stay radioactive forever, and the radioactive islands have caused ecological damage to the South Pacific. Hey, I'm sorry it happened too, but I'm NOT sorry we won the GD war!
I'll tell you what they NEVER addressed, WHY we built those test bombs, nor WHY we used 2 of the GDed things in 1945!!
Now I don't think these idiots are proponents of outright fascism, but why is it that they always prefer the robbing, raping, murdering of Fascists, Communists and Religious Fanatics running amok, to the use of the overt brute force needed to stay free? And they NEVER seem to know that INTELLECTUALS and college professors are invariably the first ones sent to concentration camps, gulags and the f*^king killing fields. So, I repeat my original question,
HOW can they get SO MUCH, SO wrong, SO OFTEN!?
.
.
Schteveo
Sunday, August 4, 2013
The Enemy Is, Us?
We all know how easy it is for illegal wetbacks, especially drug cartel members, to simply waltz across our border and commit an endless array of violent crimes here, including massive drug smuggling, kidnappings, murders, rapes, etc., then simply waltz back to Mexico. But what if those criminals didn't have to enter illegally? What if they could enter legally and commit those same crimes? What if those illegals were not illegals, but highly-trained members of (OUR) military?
Perhaps, instead of keeping itself busy trying to fill the ranks with queers and little females, and training our troops in the rules of political correctness, maybe the brass should start paying attention to something that could (literally) blow-up in their, or even worse, our faces...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/01/mexican-cartels-recruiting-hit-men-from-ranks-us-military/?test=latestnews
Perhaps, instead of keeping itself busy trying to fill the ranks with queers and little females, and training our troops in the rules of political correctness, maybe the brass should start paying attention to something that could (literally) blow-up in their, or even worse, our faces...
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/01/mexican-cartels-recruiting-hit-men-from-ranks-us-military/?test=latestnews
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Saturday Funnies
The wife's back on the warpath again. She was up
for making a sex movie last night, and all I did was suggest we should
hold auditions for her part.
~ ~ ~
I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next bowel movement could spell disaster.
~ ~ ~
My sister-in-law sat on my glasses and broke them. It was my own fault. I should have taken them off.
~ ~ ~
I spent a couple of hours defrosting the fridge last night, or "foreplay" as she likes to call it.
~ ~ ~
After both suffering from depression for awhile, me and the wife were going to commit suicide yesterday. But strangely enough, once she killed herself, I started to feel a lot better. So I thought, "Screw it, soldier on...!"
~ ~ ~
I woke up this morning at 8, and could smell something was wrong. I got downstairs and found the wife face-down on the kitchen floor, not breathing! I panicked. I didn't know what to do. Then I remembered McDonald's serves breakfast until 11:30.
~ ~ ~
Bought the missus a hamster-skin coat last week. Took her to the fair last night, and it took me 3 hours to get her off the Ferris wheel.
~ ~ ~
The other night, my wife asked me how many women I'd slept with. I told her, "Only you. All the others kept me awake all night!"
~ ~ ~
My missus packed my bags, and as I walked out the front door, she screamed, "I wish you a slow and painful death, you bastard!"
"Oh," I replied, "so now you want me to stay!"
~ ~ ~
I've just installed strobe lights in the bedroom. It makes the wife look like she's moving during sex.
~ ~ ~
I've accidentally swallowed some Scrabble tiles. My next bowel movement could spell disaster.
~ ~ ~
My sister-in-law sat on my glasses and broke them. It was my own fault. I should have taken them off.
~ ~ ~
I spent a couple of hours defrosting the fridge last night, or "foreplay" as she likes to call it.
~ ~ ~
After both suffering from depression for awhile, me and the wife were going to commit suicide yesterday. But strangely enough, once she killed herself, I started to feel a lot better. So I thought, "Screw it, soldier on...!"
~ ~ ~
I woke up this morning at 8, and could smell something was wrong. I got downstairs and found the wife face-down on the kitchen floor, not breathing! I panicked. I didn't know what to do. Then I remembered McDonald's serves breakfast until 11:30.
~ ~ ~
Bought the missus a hamster-skin coat last week. Took her to the fair last night, and it took me 3 hours to get her off the Ferris wheel.
~ ~ ~
The other night, my wife asked me how many women I'd slept with. I told her, "Only you. All the others kept me awake all night!"
~ ~ ~
My missus packed my bags, and as I walked out the front door, she screamed, "I wish you a slow and painful death, you bastard!"
"Oh," I replied, "so now you want me to stay!"
~ ~ ~
I've just installed strobe lights in the bedroom. It makes the wife look like she's moving during sex.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Loose Lips Sink Ships
Pssst, is our little gang being watched, tracked, and listened to? And if so, what would they learn, other than that some of us here might need some degree of "psychiatric supervision".
Personally, i don't have a problem with the NSA keeping track of terrorists and their supporters, no matter where they are. The problem is, Butch Napilitano and her Dept. of Homeland Stupidity are not quite sure just who or what a terrorist is. They're sure it's not Mooselambs. Ooooh, that's a no-no.
So who are the "terrorists"? Well, according to Butch Napilitano, she/he/it believes our returning combat vets, anyone who lawfully owns a firearm, Christians, White male Conservatives, and anyone who dares disagree with the Muslim-in-Chief, is a likely terrorist! Apparently, WE are the real threat our nation needs to protect itself from. Now do you understand why so many people are buying so much ammo?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/01/nsa-program-reportedly-allows-analysts-to-track-emails-chats-web-searches/
Personally, i don't have a problem with the NSA keeping track of terrorists and their supporters, no matter where they are. The problem is, Butch Napilitano and her Dept. of Homeland Stupidity are not quite sure just who or what a terrorist is. They're sure it's not Mooselambs. Ooooh, that's a no-no.
So who are the "terrorists"? Well, according to Butch Napilitano, she/he/it believes our returning combat vets, anyone who lawfully owns a firearm, Christians, White male Conservatives, and anyone who dares disagree with the Muslim-in-Chief, is a likely terrorist! Apparently, WE are the real threat our nation needs to protect itself from. Now do you understand why so many people are buying so much ammo?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/08/01/nsa-program-reportedly-allows-analysts-to-track-emails-chats-web-searches/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)