Monday, February 25, 2013

The Tree of Liberty Needs Refreshing

“We conclude that the carrying of concealed firearms (is not) protected by the Second Amendment”

Justice Carlos Lucero wrote on behalf of a three-judge panel of the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals…”

http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_22648641/federal-court-no-second-amendment-guarantee-concealed-carry

6 comments:

Spider said...

Here's another concealed carry decision, this one from the 7th Circuit.

http://www.chicagobusiness.com/article/20130222/NEWS04/130229913/7th-circuit-wont-reconsider-concealed-carry-ruling

Keep in mind that these decisions can have "national" repercussions.

Schteveo said...

NMo problem with that decision atALL. It ALSO doesn't mention laws concerning firearms other than the right to BEAR [i.e. CARRY] arms. So strike down CCW / CCH, that means we should be able to carry OPENLY ANYWHERE.

Two can play this word game Your Dishonor.

Capp'm Drunk said...

Now as much fun. Then they'd know I wus carrying when I'm at the bar

Schteveo said...

Spider,
I saw that yesterday and I was telling Mrs Schteveo about it.

I told her I thought that the anti-gun crowd won't push the issue, because they won't want this thing tied together with the Heller Decision. Then I read on and Judge Posner ALREADY tied them together!!! So, as you said, this WILL cause things to change.

Schteveo said...

Capp'm Drunk,
that's the way it USED to be. And in places where people were obviously carrying, the law took care of itself pretty much.

Spider said...

Hey guys, they're just getting started. From now on, look up!

http://www.infowars.com/video-dhs-funded-drone-spies-on-private-gun-sale/