"I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about “Barry.” Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn’t even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn’t have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.
The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement)..." --- Doug Ross
5 comments:
Not the first time I heard this, it's just a different, no wait, it's yet ANOTHER source to confirm what many of us suspected, and 99% of us have realized since this nitwit took office.
I was going to chime in and say that we all pretty much already knew this based upon his performance as POTUS - he is enamored witht he position, not the work that goes along with it.
And he is NOT an intellectual. Intellectuals ask questions and revise their world views when the answers change the information available. Obama rushes forward with an agenda that not only is not supported by the real world, but has actively been disproven by the real world time and time again, and is blind to everything that indicates that he may be wrong.
He is the exact opposite of an intellectual. more like a religious believer than a true thinker.
I must agree that most of us are certainly not surprised to find this out. Anyone who has heard Obummer speak without his teleprompters knows he's no intellectual, which means he's lied, or has had others lie, about his academic "accomplishments". And, if that's the case, what else has he lied about? Would he lie about his education and nothing else?
I've often heard him described as a "Constitutional scholar", which to me means all the times he's violated the Constitution in the last 3 1/2 years, he's done so deliberately. As i've said many times, he who controls the MSM has 3/4's of the battle won. At least.
"The great mass of people ... will more easily fall victim to a big lie than to a small one..." --- Adolf Hitler
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
I've often heard him described as a "Constitutional scholar", which to me means all the times he's violated the Constitution in the last 3 1/2 years, he's done so deliberately.
Now THERE'S a zinger if I've ver seen one. Well put!
Post a Comment