Free Elections?

Free elections are one of the things guaranteed to us by our Constitution. Personally, i would feel better if it said "fair" elections, although it wouldn't matter much to the corrupt, lying, crooks who rule us. Having free elections means nothing if those elections and their results are easily manipulated by those who lust for power and control. For example, It's now widely known that, if not for his daddy's money and Chicago Mafia connections, JFK would not have been elected president. (and had his daddy kept his promises to "the boys", JFK might still be alive) What's the big deal? No JFK, no Viet Nam war. No JFK, no LBJ, no massive escalation in Nam, and no Civil Rights giveaways. As you can see, manipulating elections can have "far reaching" consequences.

Now that our entire government is under the total control of the Demoncrats and the far-Left, it should come as no surprise to see that powerful government agencies, such as DOJ, are being used to further the Leftist agenda. Not only are they being used, they're also being quietly filled with people who's only allegiance is to their political masters, not the American people. Even if Odumbo doesn't get re-elected in 2012, how many years will it take to find, expose, and weed out these people from their positions of power and influence? The damage they cause can last for generations.

Having the ability to vote in so-called "free" elections is meaningless unless those elections are fair. And IMO, in a system like ours, where things are so easily manipulated, fair elections are simply an illusion, one designed to keep the sheeple passive...


http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=OWIwNWIxMjE5ZDI0OTRkYTU3NmY1Yjg1N2JhZDFlMDY=