Is it possible? Will the newly-elected House actually take a serious look at what is IMO, the route cause of our illegal immigration crisis? That cause is the infamous "Anchor Baby" provision that some believe is in the 14th Amendment. It allows anyone born in this country, even of parents (or a single female) here illegally, to become full citizens, entitled to all the free govt. goodies we have, and then some. And, as if that weren't enough, this "new citizen" now has the "right" to invite it's whole family here to help it enjoy all the goodies. This is why every young illegal female you see is either pregnant or pushing a bunch of new kids around in a tax payer-funded stroller. If they're not already pregnant when they sneak in, it's their very first objective.
This law came about because of a "creative interpretation" of the 14th Amendment which was originally intended to make sure that children born of slaves would have all the rights of U.S. citizens. Over the years, and as happens to so many things in the Constitution when a court or politician gets involved, protection for children born of illegals mysteriously appeared in the Amendment. At least to those on the Left. It's an automatic (and free) E-Ticket to all that America has to offer. I know of no other country that gives so much to those who break it's laws by entering illegally and draining it of it's resources.
Today, according to the MSM and those on the Left, there are about 11 million illegals here who came from Mexico and points south. In reality, that number is over 30 million, with thousands more coming in every month. And in spite of what we're told, no one here has a clue as to where they really come from. (middle easterners have been caught coming in disguised as Mexicans)
Suppose a group of people broke into your home, made themselves comfortable, and demanded that you feed them, clothe them, educate them, and care for their medical needs? Oh, and if one of them gave birth while in your home, it automatically became their home. What would you do?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/26/anchor-baby-constitutional-amendment-face-scrutiny-congress/?test=latestnews#
10 comments:
I call it the snatch and release program.
Some snatches are worth holding on to. Not many but some.
Sorry Shpidie, it WAS 75 like on Sat. But now it pluunged to a hi of 65 today and I'm searching for me longjohns. I almost had to turn on the heat this morning. Could get into the 30s at nite later in the week. Too cold to go out and brush the dust off my Jeep so I'm just going to stay in and watch SpongeBob wit da kid.
I think it's entirely possible that the incoming House may be a throwback to doing things the American way.
Let's hope so Stevie. Politically speaking, we're getting real close to the edge in this country.
Gee Poots, i feel real bad for you. With the wind chill, it's "-5" here right now with 45 mph winds, and there's "3 feet" of snow on the ground! I won't see my car till June!
65 & sunny in San Diego
The forecast calls for hyperinflation. So the 3' of snow this year will be only 1' next year. But the kid next door will charge you $800 bucks just to do a path across your property so the meter readers don't sue your ass when they come to check how much utilities you used, claim to slip, and suffer embarrassment.
we now have "wired" meters - truck drives by, computers do it all - but even though this takes significantly fewer meter readers, the unions won't let the city lay any off - go figure
The boss of a small corporate department was told by his boss that he needed to downsize that department. Having only 2 people below him, one man and one woman, both good workers, he figured he would see who went to the water cooler first, and that would be the person he would let go.
Seeing Julie by the cooler, the boss went up to her and said, "I'm sorry, but I either have to lay you of jack off."
Julie responded, "Go jack off, I'm too hung over."
:(
Post a Comment