.
At yet another energy hearing Barbara Boxer tried to disprove the beliefs of Harry Alford, current President of the National Black Chamber of Commerce, by saying other Black.org's believed something else. He was very cool to start with, then after she just kept on, and on, he...went off. It's too bad MORE people don't speak their minds like this.
.
The beginning is also priceless, it's like she's a cop, trying to confuse a crack head into telling the truth about ??? Alford let's her hold it, enjoy children.
.
I'm not sure what Harry Alford's political leanings are, but America needs more people like him who speak their minds and who aren't afraid to run against the pack.
.
.
Schteveo
Friday, July 17, 2009
TICK WARNING!
I hate it when people forward bogus warnings, and I have even done it myself a couple times unintentionally but this one is real, and it's important.
Please send this warning to everyone on your e- mail list.
If someone comes to your front door saying they are checking for ticks due to the warm weather and asks you to take your clothes off and dance around with your arms up, DO NOT DO IT!! THIS IS A SCAM!! They only want to see you naked!
(I wish I'd gotten this yesterday. I feel so stupid.)
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Buy Frito-Lays stocks!!!
.
Calif tax officials: Legal pot would rake in $1.4B
.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California tax officials say a state proposal to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol would generate nearly $1.4 billion in revenue.
A State Board of Equalization report released Wednesday estimates marijuana retail sales would bring $990 million from a $50-per-ounce fee and $392 million in sales taxes.
The bill introduced by San Francisco Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano in February would allow adults to legally possess, grow and sell marijuana.
Ammiano has promoted the bill as a way to help bridge the state's $26.3 billion budget shortfall.
As the bill is written, the state could not begin collecting taxes under the bill until the federal government legalizes marijuana.
A spokesman says Ammiano plans to amend the bill to remove that provision.
.
Meaning, they'll do this soon and screw the Feds. Hell, I'm all for that sentiment, but I'm thinking the courts will shut this down. (hoping I'm wrong, hoping I'm wrong, hoping I'm wrong...)But NONE of the deep thinkers in Sacrademento have thought of the boost to the economy via drinks, munchies, EZ-Wider and ZIG-ZIG papers, pipes, bongs, there's an entire thought patter they've ignored.
Calif tax officials: Legal pot would rake in $1.4B
.
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - California tax officials say a state proposal to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol would generate nearly $1.4 billion in revenue.
A State Board of Equalization report released Wednesday estimates marijuana retail sales would bring $990 million from a $50-per-ounce fee and $392 million in sales taxes.
The bill introduced by San Francisco Democratic Assemblyman Tom Ammiano in February would allow adults to legally possess, grow and sell marijuana.
Ammiano has promoted the bill as a way to help bridge the state's $26.3 billion budget shortfall.
As the bill is written, the state could not begin collecting taxes under the bill until the federal government legalizes marijuana.
A spokesman says Ammiano plans to amend the bill to remove that provision.
.
Meaning, they'll do this soon and screw the Feds. Hell, I'm all for that sentiment, but I'm thinking the courts will shut this down. (hoping I'm wrong, hoping I'm wrong, hoping I'm wrong...)But NONE of the deep thinkers in Sacrademento have thought of the boost to the economy via drinks, munchies, EZ-Wider and ZIG-ZIG papers, pipes, bongs, there's an entire thought patter they've ignored.
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Justice Sham
I promised myself i wasn't going to comment on the Sotomayer hearings because it would be a waste of time since we all know how it's going to turn out. But after watching for a while today, i couldn't resist.
The hearings are going along smoothly, like a well-rehearsed play. Oh, there were a couple of Republican senators making some noise and asking what appeared to be tough questions, but for the most part, she simply looked them straight in the eye, and lied with the full backing of the Demoncrats. Most of her responses were either evasive, or outright lies, even when asked to respond to her own statements! To have her sit there while her own quotes were being read to her, then listening to her respond by saying, no, i didn't say that, or, oh no senator, you don't understand what i meant", is (IMO) an outrageous insult to the American people, especially when you realize she will have a loud voice in shaping our lives for decades. If this woman is the "brilliant jurist" the Left claims she is, she does one hell of a good job hiding it!
The system for selecting Supreme Court justices is a total sham, just like the rest of our government. If the sitting president simply said to someone, hey you, put this robe on, you're now a Supreme Court Justice, that would at least be honest. But to put the country through this nonsense, while everyone already knows the outcome, is not only another waste of our tax money, but a national insult. Then again, the American people love good TV drama, especially when it's fake. And they're used to being insulted by their elected officials, so don't count on anything changing, any time soon...
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDFlZDJiOWIxNDAzZDliOGEyMTY5ZWFjYmM0Yzk1Yzk=
The hearings are going along smoothly, like a well-rehearsed play. Oh, there were a couple of Republican senators making some noise and asking what appeared to be tough questions, but for the most part, she simply looked them straight in the eye, and lied with the full backing of the Demoncrats. Most of her responses were either evasive, or outright lies, even when asked to respond to her own statements! To have her sit there while her own quotes were being read to her, then listening to her respond by saying, no, i didn't say that, or, oh no senator, you don't understand what i meant", is (IMO) an outrageous insult to the American people, especially when you realize she will have a loud voice in shaping our lives for decades. If this woman is the "brilliant jurist" the Left claims she is, she does one hell of a good job hiding it!
The system for selecting Supreme Court justices is a total sham, just like the rest of our government. If the sitting president simply said to someone, hey you, put this robe on, you're now a Supreme Court Justice, that would at least be honest. But to put the country through this nonsense, while everyone already knows the outcome, is not only another waste of our tax money, but a national insult. Then again, the American people love good TV drama, especially when it's fake. And they're used to being insulted by their elected officials, so don't count on anything changing, any time soon...
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDFlZDJiOWIxNDAzZDliOGEyMTY5ZWFjYmM0Yzk1Yzk=
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Does my shell make you horney, Baby?
.
Flight delays as JFK airport runway taken over by turtles!
.
Dozens of randy turtles crawled onto a JFK airport runway Wednesday, delaying flights for over an hour, authorities said.
Port Authority workers rushed to the shell-covered runway about 8:30 a.m. and scooped up 78 diamondback terrapins that had left the waters of Jamaica Bay scouting a spot to breed, said Port Authority spokesman John Kelly.
.
So much for manmade facilities stifling nature, huh?
.
.
Schteveo
Flight delays as JFK airport runway taken over by turtles!
.
Dozens of randy turtles crawled onto a JFK airport runway Wednesday, delaying flights for over an hour, authorities said.
Port Authority workers rushed to the shell-covered runway about 8:30 a.m. and scooped up 78 diamondback terrapins that had left the waters of Jamaica Bay scouting a spot to breed, said Port Authority spokesman John Kelly.
.
So much for manmade facilities stifling nature, huh?
.
.
Schteveo
Monday, July 13, 2009
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Friday, July 10, 2009
Convoluted Thinking from the Left Side of SOCUS
.
I'm not sure just how to take this little bon mot.
.
In an interview to be published in Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she thought the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion was predicated on the Supreme Court majority's desire to diminish “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
In the 90-minute interview in Ginsburg’s temporary chambers, Ginsburg gave the Times her perspective on Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s first high court nomination. She also discussed her views on abortion.
.
So, is the good Justice saying that SOCUS voted what they WANTED done "legally" for personal, or idealogical reasons, not what was really approvable under the Constitution?
Say it isn't so, the Supreme Court would NEVER do anything like that.
.
Not to mention the whole liberals wanting abortions legalized, conservatives want them stopped, liberals own the LOVE of minorities, conservatives would love to OWN minorities argument.
.
Can one of the Justices be removed for mental reasons, 'cause Ginsburg's lost it this time!!!
.
And, by all means, read the comments.
.
.
Schteveo
.
I'm not sure just how to take this little bon mot.
.
In an interview to be published in Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said she thought the landmark Roe v. Wade decision on abortion was predicated on the Supreme Court majority's desire to diminish “populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
In the 90-minute interview in Ginsburg’s temporary chambers, Ginsburg gave the Times her perspective on Judge Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s first high court nomination. She also discussed her views on abortion.
.
So, is the good Justice saying that SOCUS voted what they WANTED done "legally" for personal, or idealogical reasons, not what was really approvable under the Constitution?
Say it isn't so, the Supreme Court would NEVER do anything like that.
.
Not to mention the whole liberals wanting abortions legalized, conservatives want them stopped, liberals own the LOVE of minorities, conservatives would love to OWN minorities argument.
.
Can one of the Justices be removed for mental reasons, 'cause Ginsburg's lost it this time!!!
.
And, by all means, read the comments.
.
.
Schteveo
.
What Price Will We Pay For This
A few months back, the news was all about waterboarding and alleged torture. At the time, the wild-eyed speaker of the House, Botox Nancy, after having been caught in an obvious lie about what she knew, thought the best way for her to get herself out of it was to tell another lie and accuse the CIA of committing a Federal crime, to wit, lying to congress. Even the fact that president Obummer had given control of the CIA to a big-time liberal Demoncrat, (Leon Panetta) didn't stop her from trying to destroy the agency simply to save her rock-hard face. In fact, she went so far as to go on national TV like some raving crack-head and ranted incoherently. That performance alone should have been more than enough to end her infamous career!
The problem for Botox was that even liberal Panetta wasn't going to stand for it. He fought back, but with facts, proving Botox was in fact lying. After a couple of weeks, while the MSM desperately tried to find some other news to get her off the front pages, Botox was quietly hustled off to China for "diplomatic meetings", even though the Speaker of the House is not authorized to conduct foreign policy.
Now that a few months have passed, and having noticed that the heat from the weak, gutless Republicans has died down, she has apparently managed to line-up a few of her trained lap dogs in an attempt to save her rock-hard face again. This time, it's some leftist clown from Mexas, Rep. Reyes, a guy who, on a good day, can maybe manage 2 or 3 words of English, who she put out front to take the return fire, should there be any. The obvious fact that these commies are playing with the nations security doesn't seem to bother them in the least, not when their queen's reputation and possibly her political future are at stake...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124718513104720457.html
The problem for Botox was that even liberal Panetta wasn't going to stand for it. He fought back, but with facts, proving Botox was in fact lying. After a couple of weeks, while the MSM desperately tried to find some other news to get her off the front pages, Botox was quietly hustled off to China for "diplomatic meetings", even though the Speaker of the House is not authorized to conduct foreign policy.
Now that a few months have passed, and having noticed that the heat from the weak, gutless Republicans has died down, she has apparently managed to line-up a few of her trained lap dogs in an attempt to save her rock-hard face again. This time, it's some leftist clown from Mexas, Rep. Reyes, a guy who, on a good day, can maybe manage 2 or 3 words of English, who she put out front to take the return fire, should there be any. The obvious fact that these commies are playing with the nations security doesn't seem to bother them in the least, not when their queen's reputation and possibly her political future are at stake...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124718513104720457.html
The next Loopy-Lefty Political Pundit, Levi Johnson
.
In the ongoing effort of the left to discredit Sarah Palin, the leftists from the MSM have found a new insider in Alaska Politics, 19 y/o Levi Johnson, ex-boyfriend and "baby daddy", who used his previous smarts and insider info, to avoid parents and Alaska HP Security, to knock up his 17 y/o girlfriend, Bristol Palin.
.
Johnson says he thinks Gov. Palin left office to go after the money aspects of her fame. This, to me, sounds like the polar bear calling the snowflake white, as Johnson is currently trying to sell his story for a book or a movie.
.
His STORY? What movie prospects would he have if he'd spent a buck on some condoms?
.
Plus, Johnson thinks Palin is a bad choic for VP or President. He should know about bad decisions, he made about the biggest one a teenager can make. But, who shouldn't listen to him? He's 19, a man, a father!! Personally, I'll listen to him from here on out, I get all my voting intel and make decisions based on opinions of people who've never done it. Vote I mean, he's done the big IT, right?
.
What I don't get is just how deep will they go to put doubt on Palin? Seriously, WHAT'S NEXT, stories about Sarah Palin's turds, before and after the election, from her plumber? The Palin Family's Stains, the insider story from One Hour Martinizing of Wasilla. The Long Road to D.C., by Sarah Palin's personal Tire Salesman.
Personally I think Johnson's father should have done what Palin did, back out gracefully before his "term" was finished.
.
.
Schteveo
In the ongoing effort of the left to discredit Sarah Palin, the leftists from the MSM have found a new insider in Alaska Politics, 19 y/o Levi Johnson, ex-boyfriend and "baby daddy", who used his previous smarts and insider info, to avoid parents and Alaska HP Security, to knock up his 17 y/o girlfriend, Bristol Palin.
.
Johnson says he thinks Gov. Palin left office to go after the money aspects of her fame. This, to me, sounds like the polar bear calling the snowflake white, as Johnson is currently trying to sell his story for a book or a movie.
.
His STORY? What movie prospects would he have if he'd spent a buck on some condoms?
.
Plus, Johnson thinks Palin is a bad choic for VP or President. He should know about bad decisions, he made about the biggest one a teenager can make. But, who shouldn't listen to him? He's 19, a man, a father!! Personally, I'll listen to him from here on out, I get all my voting intel and make decisions based on opinions of people who've never done it. Vote I mean, he's done the big IT, right?
.
What I don't get is just how deep will they go to put doubt on Palin? Seriously, WHAT'S NEXT, stories about Sarah Palin's turds, before and after the election, from her plumber? The Palin Family's Stains, the insider story from One Hour Martinizing of Wasilla. The Long Road to D.C., by Sarah Palin's personal Tire Salesman.
Personally I think Johnson's father should have done what Palin did, back out gracefully before his "term" was finished.
.
.
Schteveo
Thursday, July 9, 2009
Caption This
~
Caption? You could write a book around that scene.
~
Photo courtesy of Reuters - but they have the caption wrong.
~
The D.O.J., America's Gestapo
Now that the far-left is in full control of the government, or as i like to put it, "the patients are running the asylum", we're starting to notice some strange things happening in places where strange things shouldn't happen. One of those places is the US Dept. of Justice. One would assume the DOJ is an agency which is mandated to follow the rule of law, but apparently that's not the case, especially when it's been filled with Leftist political hacks, quietly hand-picked by Obamunists.
We all know Joe Arpiao, the tough, no-nonsense Sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ. Well, it appears Sheriff Joe may be in trouble with the Feds. Why? Because Joe is a guy who believes his job is to protect the people who voted him into office. Also, Joe believes that, as a law enforcement officer, his job is to enforce the law. (sounds right to me) But here's the problem. Sheriff Joe is enforcing immigration laws, the very laws that the lying, corrupt, communists who are in control of this govt. don't want enforced. Since they don't believe this country should have a border, they therefor don't feel anyone coming into this country illegally is breaking any laws. Of course, the true motive of these Leftist Demoncrats is that they see every illegal as another vote which will keep them in power and control. 30 to 40+ Million illegals voting can make a very big difference in any election! This is the real reason Sheriff Joe has a target on his back. What i find truly sad is that there is not a national outrage over his treatment by these left-wing, political assassins...
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTA1ZDYyYzVjNmNiYWZlNzgxNDc4MGUyOTY1MjJlNzM=
We all know Joe Arpiao, the tough, no-nonsense Sheriff of Maricopa County, AZ. Well, it appears Sheriff Joe may be in trouble with the Feds. Why? Because Joe is a guy who believes his job is to protect the people who voted him into office. Also, Joe believes that, as a law enforcement officer, his job is to enforce the law. (sounds right to me) But here's the problem. Sheriff Joe is enforcing immigration laws, the very laws that the lying, corrupt, communists who are in control of this govt. don't want enforced. Since they don't believe this country should have a border, they therefor don't feel anyone coming into this country illegally is breaking any laws. Of course, the true motive of these Leftist Demoncrats is that they see every illegal as another vote which will keep them in power and control. 30 to 40+ Million illegals voting can make a very big difference in any election! This is the real reason Sheriff Joe has a target on his back. What i find truly sad is that there is not a national outrage over his treatment by these left-wing, political assassins...
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTA1ZDYyYzVjNmNiYWZlNzgxNDc4MGUyOTY1MjJlNzM=
Obviously NOT a Racial Hate Crime
Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family
Group of white people attacked by a group of black people yelling "This is a black world", but it's not racially motivated.
Group of white people attacked by a group of black people yelling "This is a black world", but it's not racially motivated.
Elitist Hypocrit
Remember when Michelle Obama contrasted her "budget shopping" with Sarah Palin's $150,000 clothing budget? Well looky what Michelle's spending her money on now (which the White House...of course...denies). (Notice Comrade O'Change's comment under "Discuss this Article". LOL!)
Wednesday, July 8, 2009
With all the bad stuff in schools
I don't see the big issue here. The teacher wore a graduation robe and clown tie and the girl wore a sheet over her clothes, it was done on a playground, and there was no kiss .. it just seems like a goofy innocent time with fun had by all. Am I the only person who does not see what the big deal is? Are there not real actual problems in schools that this has to be national news?
Article Page
Article Page
So dope is bad for us, unless it helps the gub'ment?
.
Pro-marijuana ad pushes pot as Calif. budget fix
.
SAN FRANCISCO — A pro-marijuana group is launching another television bid to legalize pot in California — this time with the pitch that legalizing and taxing the drug could help solve the state's massive budget deficit.
The 30-second spot, airing Wednesday and paid for by the Marijuana Policy Project, features a retired 58-year-old state worker who says state leaders "are ignoring millions of Californians who want to pay taxes."
"We're marijuana consumers," says Nadene Herndon of Fair Oaks, who says she began using marijuana after suffering multiple strokes three years ago. "Instead of being treated like criminals for using a substance safer than alcohol, we want to pay our fair share."
State lawmakers are bitterly debating how to close a $26.3 billion budget deficit that likely means cuts to state services.
In February, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, introduced a bill to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol. Bill supporters estimate the state's pot industry could bring in more than $1 billion in taxes.
The ad will air on several cable news channels and network broadcast affiliates in Los Angeles, Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay area, according to the Marijuana Policy Project.
The group said in a statement that three California stations — KABC-TV in Los Angeles, KGO-TV of San Francisco and KNTV-TV in San Jose — refused to air the ad.
Representatives from the three stations did not immediately return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment.
In an e-mail to the group, a KNTV account executive said the station's standards department had rejected the ad.
.
Don't get me wrong, I think pot should be legal and taxed. But the thought that JUST taxing ganga will fix California's financial problems proves that some Legislators out there are smoking the "doobage", regularly.
.
.
Schteveo is a law abiding citizen
.
Pro-marijuana ad pushes pot as Calif. budget fix
.
SAN FRANCISCO — A pro-marijuana group is launching another television bid to legalize pot in California — this time with the pitch that legalizing and taxing the drug could help solve the state's massive budget deficit.
The 30-second spot, airing Wednesday and paid for by the Marijuana Policy Project, features a retired 58-year-old state worker who says state leaders "are ignoring millions of Californians who want to pay taxes."
"We're marijuana consumers," says Nadene Herndon of Fair Oaks, who says she began using marijuana after suffering multiple strokes three years ago. "Instead of being treated like criminals for using a substance safer than alcohol, we want to pay our fair share."
State lawmakers are bitterly debating how to close a $26.3 billion budget deficit that likely means cuts to state services.
In February, Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, introduced a bill to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol. Bill supporters estimate the state's pot industry could bring in more than $1 billion in taxes.
The ad will air on several cable news channels and network broadcast affiliates in Los Angeles, Sacramento and the San Francisco Bay area, according to the Marijuana Policy Project.
The group said in a statement that three California stations — KABC-TV in Los Angeles, KGO-TV of San Francisco and KNTV-TV in San Jose — refused to air the ad.
Representatives from the three stations did not immediately return calls from The Associated Press seeking comment.
In an e-mail to the group, a KNTV account executive said the station's standards department had rejected the ad.
.
Don't get me wrong, I think pot should be legal and taxed. But the thought that JUST taxing ganga will fix California's financial problems proves that some Legislators out there are smoking the "doobage", regularly.
.
.
Schteveo is a law abiding citizen
.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
In death, as he was in life
.
Michael Jackson to be buried without his brain
.
Michael Jackson will be buried this week– without his brain. As his family tries to finalise details for the King of Pop’s funeral on Tuesday they have been told it will be held back for tests.
They faced the grim choice of waiting up to three weeks for Jackson’s brain to be returned to them or go ahead and bury him without it – which they have decided to do.
Los Angeles Coroner’s spokesman Craig Harvey confirmed that neuropathology tests will be carried out to see if it holds any clues to the exact cause of his death.
But the examination cannot begin until at least two weeks after the death when the brain has hardened sufficiently to slice it open.
.
.
Schteveo knows funny shit when he hears it
.
Michael Jackson to be buried without his brain
.
Michael Jackson will be buried this week– without his brain. As his family tries to finalise details for the King of Pop’s funeral on Tuesday they have been told it will be held back for tests.
They faced the grim choice of waiting up to three weeks for Jackson’s brain to be returned to them or go ahead and bury him without it – which they have decided to do.
Los Angeles Coroner’s spokesman Craig Harvey confirmed that neuropathology tests will be carried out to see if it holds any clues to the exact cause of his death.
But the examination cannot begin until at least two weeks after the death when the brain has hardened sufficiently to slice it open.
.
.
Schteveo knows funny shit when he hears it
.
The strange and the curious case of Steve McNair
.
As previously stated, I am not a big sports fan. There's stuff I watch, stuff I don't, but this story caught my eye. For the un-informed, McNair, a retired NFL quarterback, was found shot to death over the weekend, near him was a 20 something woman, also deceased. McNair had been shot 4 times, two in the chest, one in each temple, the woman was shot once, in the head. They've danced all around McNair being married and just what his relationship is with this deceased babe.
.
It took the police two days to call McNair's death a homicide. They're toying with calling her's suicide.
.
Here's my question, would the police, and the MSM, be taking this careful, hands off approach if the players in this little drama were WHITE? If it was John Elway, would intel be dribbling out, or would "sources" be telling us everything as it became known?
.
.
Schteveo has an inquiring mind
.
.
UPDATE 7 / 8 18:45
.
So, McNair's GIRLFRIEND shot him, because she thought he was seeing somebody else. Maybe he was just going home to his wife, huh?
.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP)—Former NFL star Steve McNair(notes) was shot dead in his sleep last week by a 20-year-old girlfriend distraught about mounting financial problems and her belief that he was seeing someone else, police said Wednesday.
As previously stated, I am not a big sports fan. There's stuff I watch, stuff I don't, but this story caught my eye. For the un-informed, McNair, a retired NFL quarterback, was found shot to death over the weekend, near him was a 20 something woman, also deceased. McNair had been shot 4 times, two in the chest, one in each temple, the woman was shot once, in the head. They've danced all around McNair being married and just what his relationship is with this deceased babe.
.
It took the police two days to call McNair's death a homicide. They're toying with calling her's suicide.
.
Here's my question, would the police, and the MSM, be taking this careful, hands off approach if the players in this little drama were WHITE? If it was John Elway, would intel be dribbling out, or would "sources" be telling us everything as it became known?
.
.
Schteveo has an inquiring mind
.
.
UPDATE 7 / 8 18:45
.
So, McNair's GIRLFRIEND shot him, because she thought he was seeing somebody else. Maybe he was just going home to his wife, huh?
.
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP)—Former NFL star Steve McNair(notes) was shot dead in his sleep last week by a 20-year-old girlfriend distraught about mounting financial problems and her belief that he was seeing someone else, police said Wednesday.
The Priorities of CNN
I already wrote CNN. I think a lot of people should. Even with a top main section devoted to Michael Jackson, a story about 8 US Soldiers being killed in Afghanistan is still story number 9 in their 'latest news' section with 7 MJ related stories ahead of it.
For your review...
Class Act
Here’s another example of one of the Left’s oldest (and most effective) tricks. Take someone’s words, spin them around until they say what you want them to say, then attack using the lies you’ve created. The object behind this tactic is of course, to put your enemies on the defensive. To the uninformed, this gives the appearance of guilt. It’s a tactic that the Left has mastered and one that almost never fails to do damage. It is exactly what they’re doing to Sarah Palin right now.
Jon Voight is a highly-accomplished and well-known actor. And aside from having an ultra-hot daughter, he’s also known for being a staunch conservative, something that truly makes him an oddity in Commiewood. Because of his political beliefs, Mr. Voight, and the few others in his industry who believe as he does, has been a constant target. In fact, knowing how his industry is controlled by Communists, Marxists, and Socialists, I’m surprised he gets any work at all.
A smart and tough Russian immigrant I know, (I’d swear he’s “former” KGB) once told me, “if you want to find communism these days, don’t look to Russia, look to Hollywood.”
Monday, July 6, 2009
Nobody in Nebraska owns a knife, a scalpel or any scissors?
.
...and on the topic of personal responsibility.
.
The Nebraska man who abandoned his nine children last year under the state's Safe Haven law and whose girlfriend is now expecting twins is "clearly troubled" and brings a "black eye" to the state, local lawmakers told FOXNews.com.
Gary Staton, 37, became a single father in February 2007 when his wife, RebelJane, died shortly after giving birth to their ninth child. Unable to handle the burden alone, Staton made national news more than a year later when he dropped off his children — ages 1 to 17 — at a hospital in Omaha.
.
And what a fine picture of manhood he is. Seriously, what's wrong with a 37 y/o, white guy, wearing his ball cap backward, looking like something from a bad gangsta rap video? Someone needs to pour more chlorine and pot ash in the Nebraska gene pool.
.
.
Schteveo is sad for those kids
...and on the topic of personal responsibility.
.
The Nebraska man who abandoned his nine children last year under the state's Safe Haven law and whose girlfriend is now expecting twins is "clearly troubled" and brings a "black eye" to the state, local lawmakers told FOXNews.com.
Gary Staton, 37, became a single father in February 2007 when his wife, RebelJane, died shortly after giving birth to their ninth child. Unable to handle the burden alone, Staton made national news more than a year later when he dropped off his children — ages 1 to 17 — at a hospital in Omaha.
.
And what a fine picture of manhood he is. Seriously, what's wrong with a 37 y/o, white guy, wearing his ball cap backward, looking like something from a bad gangsta rap video? Someone needs to pour more chlorine and pot ash in the Nebraska gene pool.
.
.
Schteveo is sad for those kids
The Lone Voice Of Truth
NY congressman Peter King, a conservative Republican from Long Island, is the only public person that I’m aware of who has the courage to actually speak the truth about the death of the child-molesting, junkie freak who died last week. Like millions of other Americans, Mr. King is about ready to throw up over the MSM’s non-stop worshiping of MJ, while at the same time, doing their best to gut Sarah Palin. Again.
And, as is typical when there’s the aroma of attention and money in the air, there was NYC’s most famous con-artist on CNN this morning. Yes, it was Al $harpton in some black church in Mexifornia, scolding America. It seems Al was “demanding” that America pay the same homage to the little freak as was paid to greats like Elvis and Frank Sinatra! (you may recall neither of them was a child molester ) We NY’ers know how good Al is when there’s a hefty “donation” ($$$) waiting for him at the end of his performance. As for the MSM’s obsessive coverage, well, we all know what whores they are, so there’s no surprise there.
But what does this say about the people of America? What does this tell the world about us as a society? As usual, it ain’t good!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/07/06/new-york-congressman-blasts-jackson-pervert-low-life/
Sunday, July 5, 2009
50 THINGS WRONG WITH THE WAXMAN-MARKEY CAP-AND-TRADE BILL
(besides Waxman's snout)
A Garden of Piggish Delights
Waxman-Markey is part power-grab, part enviro-fantasy. Here are 50 reasons to stop it.
The House of Representatives, famously, did not read this bill before passing it, which is testament to either Nancy Pelosi’s managerial incompetency or her political wile, or possibly both. If you take the time to read the legislation, you’ll discover four major themes: special-interest giveaways, regulatory mandates unrelated to climate change, fanciful technological programs worthy of The Jetsons, and assorted left-wing wish fulfillment.
A Garden of Piggish Delights
Waxman-Markey is part power-grab, part enviro-fantasy. Here are 50 reasons to stop it.
The House of Representatives, famously, did not read this bill before passing it, which is testament to either Nancy Pelosi’s managerial incompetency or her political wile, or possibly both. If you take the time to read the legislation, you’ll discover four major themes: special-interest giveaways, regulatory mandates unrelated to climate change, fanciful technological programs worthy of The Jetsons, and assorted left-wing wish fulfillment.
Saturday, July 4, 2009
The Tree of Liberty
I thought this would be good for all of us to read today, especially today. Happy 4th my Friends.
written by Thomas Jefferson to William Smith
Paris, November 13, 1787
DEAR SIR, -- I am now to acknoledge the receipt of your favors of October the 4th, 8th, & 26th. In the last you apologise for your letters of introduction to Americans coming here. It is so far from needing apology on your part, that it calls for thanks on mine. I endeavor to show civilities to all the Americans who come here, & will give me opportunities of doing it: and it is a matter of comfort to know from a good quarter what they are, & how far I may go in my attentions to them. Can you send me Woodmason's bills for the two copying presses for the M. de la Fayette, & the M. de Chastellux? The latter makes one article in a considerable account, of old standing, and which I cannot present for want of this article. -- I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: & very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: & what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent & persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, & what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusetts? And can history produce an instance of rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it's motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it's natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusetts: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen-yard in order. I hope in God this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted. -- You ask me if any thing transpires here on the subject of S. America? Not a word. I know that there are combustible materials there, and that they wait the torch only. But this country probably will join the extinguishers. -- The want of facts worth communicating to you has occasioned me to give a little loose to dissertation. We must be contented to amuse, when we cannot inform.
20 years without a rebellion? I'm thinking then, that we're long overdue.
.
.
Steve
written by Thomas Jefferson to William Smith
Paris, November 13, 1787
DEAR SIR, -- I am now to acknoledge the receipt of your favors of October the 4th, 8th, & 26th. In the last you apologise for your letters of introduction to Americans coming here. It is so far from needing apology on your part, that it calls for thanks on mine. I endeavor to show civilities to all the Americans who come here, & will give me opportunities of doing it: and it is a matter of comfort to know from a good quarter what they are, & how far I may go in my attentions to them. Can you send me Woodmason's bills for the two copying presses for the M. de la Fayette, & the M. de Chastellux? The latter makes one article in a considerable account, of old standing, and which I cannot present for want of this article. -- I do not know whether it is to yourself or Mr. Adams I am to give my thanks for the copy of the new constitution. I beg leave through you to place them where due. It will be yet three weeks before I shall receive them from America. There are very good articles in it: & very bad. I do not know which preponderate. What we have lately read in the history of Holland, in the chapter on the Stadtholder, would have sufficed to set me against a chief magistrate eligible for a long duration, if I had ever been disposed towards one: & what we have always read of the elections of Polish kings should have forever excluded the idea of one continuable for life. Wonderful is the effect of impudent & persevering lying. The British ministry have so long hired their gazetteers to repeat and model into every form lies about our being in anarchy, that the world has at length believed them, the English nation has believed them, the ministers themselves have come to believe them, & what is more wonderful, we have believed them ourselves. Yet where does this anarchy exist? Where did it ever exist, except in the single instance of Massachusetts? And can history produce an instance of rebellion so honourably conducted? I say nothing of it's motives. They were founded in ignorance, not wickedness. God forbid we should ever be 20 years without such a rebellion. The people cannot be all, & always well informed. The part which is wrong will be discontented in proportion to the importance of the facts they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions it is a lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. We have had 13. states independent 11. years. There has been one rebellion. That comes to one rebellion in a century & a half for each state. What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is it's natural manure. Our Convention has been too much impressed by the insurrection of Massachusetts: and in the spur of the moment they are setting up a kite to keep the hen-yard in order. I hope in God this article will be rectified before the new constitution is accepted. -- You ask me if any thing transpires here on the subject of S. America? Not a word. I know that there are combustible materials there, and that they wait the torch only. But this country probably will join the extinguishers. -- The want of facts worth communicating to you has occasioned me to give a little loose to dissertation. We must be contented to amuse, when we cannot inform.
20 years without a rebellion? I'm thinking then, that we're long overdue.
.
.
Steve
Friday, July 3, 2009
This One's For BOW
I know some people who have their head up their ass, but puting your teeth in your eye? That's a new one on me........ I hope all the members of our little family here have a very safe and enjoyable 4th of July. Oh, and don't forget to throw that thing after you light the fuse!
Thursday, July 2, 2009
Stick a fork in California, they're done
.
The elected morons in Sacramento have done it again. They're going to collect salaries, but send IOUs to many who have needs.
This seems like it's been decided by people making the last grab at what little remains. I'm no fan of welfare, but this seems like a travesty to me. The legislators, most of whom are lawyers or business owners, get their salary, but the blind and disabled get vouchers.
.
I expect there's about to be a riot.
.
Here's an in depth article.
.
.
Schteveo's glad he don' be livin' out dere
The elected morons in Sacramento have done it again. They're going to collect salaries, but send IOUs to many who have needs.
This seems like it's been decided by people making the last grab at what little remains. I'm no fan of welfare, but this seems like a travesty to me. The legislators, most of whom are lawyers or business owners, get their salary, but the blind and disabled get vouchers.
.
I expect there's about to be a riot.
.
Here's an in depth article.
.
.
Schteveo's glad he don' be livin' out dere
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)