I'm passing this along as i thought it was interesting...... it's by Neal Boortz...
"We've started collecting stories, documenting all of the different ways that the ObamaMedia can claim "racism." If you will recall, leading up to the 2008 election, it was racist to refer to Obama as "skinny" or "eloquent" or "a community organizer." Now that we already seem to be in campaign mode, the list is growing again. We've known this was coming since Obama's incompetence became apparent to all. It is absolutely impossible to campaign on the successes of Barack Obama .. because there aren't any. The entire campaign is going to be based on attacks against Obama's opponents rather than praise for his successful first 3 years.
The most obvious line of attack is to say that Obama's opponents don't want him reelected because he's black. The people who push this absurdity can't seem to explain why people who voted for him the first time have suddenly changed their minds. Was there something in the water? A racist microbe that changed otherwise normal people into racist maniacs? Hardly. It was the reality of Barack Obama that changed them. What they hoped would not be true turned out to be so. Obama was totally ill-prepared for the office, and was, in fact, far too much of a radical leftist to maintain the confidence of the thinking portion of the American public. So ... prepare yourselves to hear the "R" word time and time again during the campaign. Have pity on these poor Democrats ... they really have nothing else.
Let's look at some examples:
First there was the incident from a few weeks ago where the Associated Press was charged with committing an act of "inherent racism" for transcribing an Obama speech to the Congressional Black Caucus and "dropping the G's." Remember this? "Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin'." So for future reference, it is racist for you to drop the G's (as he did) when quoting Obama.
Then we have Libtard Bill Maher proclaiming that Republicans saying that there is no racism in America anymore is "the new racism." So now you can't claim there isn't any racism, because that is inherently racist.
Now we have two more to add to the list. Are you ready?
According to MSNBC's Ed Shultz, if you use the term "break" in reference to Obama, this is racist. Shultz was apparently discussing Herman Cain's potential running mates, and one of those is Senator Jim DeMint. Shultz says that DeMint is "the guy who used an old Southern, racist term when talking about defeating President Obama during the health care debate." Here is the offending statement from 2009: "If we're able to stop Obama on this, it will be his Waterloo. It will break him." So using the word "break" is racist when referring to Obama. Got it?
The last example we will add to the list … you are going to love this …
Pointing out that only 53% of Americans pay federal income taxes is racist. In a discussion on MSNBC, Melissa Harris Perry (a black female) commented on a video clip of Michele Bachmann pointing out that only 53% of Americans pay federal income taxes and that we all should contribute something. Melissa Harris Perry says, "I just think that's racism," and that this is just a codeword for the "2011 version of a welfare queen." She says, "What that is meant to imply is that there is a whole group that is dependent." She goes on to describe these dependent groups as "the 'illegal immigrants,' and these un-working, un-married, poor black women who are welfare queens and these criminal types …" So pointing out that only 53% of Americans pay federal income taxes is "racism."
Be prepared!
9 comments:
OK, so most of us are racists, and the administration and MSM are willing to say it or use it to their advantage.
I'm seeing business as usual. Except that now, they see the 'need' to defend a guy who IS the one with the most power, instead of the millions with no power.
But wouldn't it be great fun should Cain get the nomination? I think it would be hilarious how they try to play the race card then. The points you bring up here are already waaaay out there. What will they resort to if Obama has to run against a guy who actually had two black parents instead of one?
They know Cain would void their use of the race card which is why they already started painting him as an uncle Tom. I've also heard it said on MSNBC that Cain "may have" some troubling things in his past. It's their way of planting the seeds of distrust and perhaps making Cain go on the defensive, although i don't think he's the type.
Once again, the Left uses their favorite tactic of puting their enemies on the defensive using "innuendo". They leave the rest to the MSM and the court of public opinion. Still very effective.
"As president, Herman Cain would be the left's worst nightmare. Cain would be historic, not as the first black president, but as the first black "leader" to occupy the Oval Office. Cain's Justice Department would distribute equal justice to all Americans regardless of skin color, unlike the Obama Justice Department which said they would not press charges against fellow blacks. President Cain would be a true celebration of all which has made America great; education, hard work, individuality, character, religious faith and freedom. Such wholesome virtues are deemed corny and repulsive to the left who are typically spoiled brat former hippie rich white kids..."
–- Lloyd Marcus
A.Levy...excellent quote. Who is Lloyd Marcus?
Lloyd Marcus;
http://bigjournalism.com/author/lmarcus/
Aw shit! There's the "hippie" thing again!!
I wish people would understand a simple rule to follow. If looking for rules to follow who's who, hippies went to work, RADICALS went to college. Liberal colleges at that. Most of them go to high dollar, liberal colleges.
Most of the hippies I know / knew thought high dollar was being able to afford two bags of weed outta one pay check!
Obama talking to the American people following his 2012 loss:
Obama: The American people didn't vote for me because I am black.
People: No Mr. Obama. We the people voted for you because you are black. We are firing you because your incompetent!
From the "look at what's coming" file, here's a story that shows how we're losing more liberty and freedom every day. Of course, the govt. won't call it a loss of freedom, they just call it something snappy, like, "protecting you from terrorists". How long will it be before we have to show our "papers" when traveling interstate.
Maybe it's just me, but i would think the best way to protect us would be to actually secure our borders. But what do i know.
Can you say, "YOUR PAPERS"?
http://www.newschannel5.com/story/15725035
/officials-claim-tennessee-becomes-first-state-to-deploy-vipr-statewide
Post a Comment