This is a story about laws that have been invented to protect special, highly pampered groups of people in our society, such as blacks and gays, and how those laws are selectively applied. Apparently, the rest of society, especially White society, is not worthy of such protection. In fact, as we speak, congress is ready to expand the so-called "hate crime" laws to cover a whole array of sexual sub-humans. You see, to the Demoncrats, everyone (or thing) is a potential vote.
It is also a story about an incredibly brutal crime and the MSM's failure to report on it (it took the British media to report it ) because as numerous as they are, black on White crimes are not PC, whereas White on black crimes are. (remember their nation-wide, 24/7 coverage of the phony Duke University lacrosse team rape case?) And now that we're stuck with a half-breed in the WH, crime reporting has become all but color-less.
If there was ever a case that demanded the death penalty, it's this one. But, in 2009 Amerika, where young White people enjoy pretending to be black, where the minority has become the majority, it probably won't happen. Personally, and as i've always said about animals like these, it's too bad you can only take someones life once...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1220695/Is-political-correctness-blame-lack-coverage-horrific-black-white-killings-Americas-Deep-South-Tennessee-Channon-Christian-Christopher-Newsom-carjack.html
16 comments:
Beyond horrific and disgusting, the entire scenario
I don't shoot koonz and subhumans fer hate... I dew it fer fun
Several things.
1st - lethal injection is too good for animals like this. I'm a proponent of taking them, post conviction,
putting them in a room with the MOTHER, or any FEMALE she designates
they can have any objects they ask for
the mother / designee, gets 1 hour, alone with the convicted animal
they are allowed to do ANYTHING they want, but they cannot kill the animal, or injure so as to cause death
then, the convict can do their time,
BUT
all the while knowing, that the mother, or some designee, has one more time they can have the convict, sometime, someday, no scheduling, 24/7, 365, until the sentence is completed
(effing yes, I'm serious, as a heart attack)
2nd - it's not that this was, as the article said,
"...US media’s decision to largely ignore the story..."
it wasn't ignored, it was buried. (just like the Tea Party story, last Sat here) I live 5 or 6 hours from Knoxville, I never heard this. But I get news from L.A. and HI, about hate crimes with whitey as the perp. No bias there.
3rd - When did Knoxville get to be the Deep South? If that's deep, Cincinnati and Pittsburgh must be THE South now? Deep South is (or used to be) Southern Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama and eastern Louisiana.
4th - Yes, the mothers or their designee. It's simple, women can be far more cruel than men when crossed and would be far more devious in such situations.
(sorry if that bothers anyone, but all I have to go on, are MY experiences)
My God. If it wasn't a hate crime, then it wouldn't be hate when I killed all the bastards if that were my son or daughter.
I think the term "hate crime" is stupid to begin with.
What difference does it make if you rape, murder and pillage people with your skin color, or without it? The dead victims sure as hell have no capacity to care. Unless the families ALREADY have such divisive ideals, they won't care. Or at least I wouldn't.
I can't imagine myself, sitting in the funeral, crying and thinking,
"...I'm sure glad it was 4 white guys, and a woman, of Italian, German, Irish and Scots-Irish decent, who raped and murdered my daughter and her boyfriend!! I don't think I could take it, if they'd had BROWN SKIN!!!"
What a totally asinine concept. Unless, as I previously stated, you've already decided that skin color matters.
.
.
I realized afer reading this the second time looking for references, that the boyfriend was "raped". I'm assuming that means the woman present did the deed. I say that because as graphic as this article is, I'm betting if one or more of the guys had "raped" him, the Telegraph would have said sodomized, not raped.
Then again, it's England, maybe the sodomy part slipped by them? (the silly poofs)
"I realized afer reading this the second time looking for references, that the boyfriend was "raped". I'm assuming that means the woman present did the deed."
I guess you've never been in prison.
OK, Anon, I'll play your silly game. And at this point, I've lost track of which Anon is which. We have several folks who post that way.
Anyway.
Generally stories I've read in the past, specifically say SODOMIZED, when men rape other men, and they are trying to convey the horror of the crime to those NOT having been "in stir", "on state", in da BIG house", etc. I'm assuming that there are people in San Francisco who read the Telegraph too. So maybe, the Telegraph toned it down so they wouldn't go crazy and swarm to Knoxville?
Back to the serious side. Go back and read what I wrote. I said this,
"...as graphic as this article is, I'm betting if one or more of the guys had "raped" him, the Telegraph would have said sodomized, not raped."
See, I did address that possibility. But I questioned who did what to whom, with respect to the verbiage used by the Telegraph. I'm also assuming that the female thug did not savage the female victim for two reasons. That is very unusual AND again, the article does not specifically say that, EVEN THOUGH it is quite graphic in telling the events that occurred.
And to answer your other question, yes, I've been in jail. Only once, in Alaska, and just overnight. About 20 hours all told. But evidently, the mostly white Alaskan jail population, prefers a thinner, younger type of victim. And quite frankly, I'm fine with having no direct experience with jailhouse man rape.
I did get "busted" at the beach once, for vagrancy. But the Sheriff didn't finger print or mug shot any of the 4 of us. He fed us in the morning and drove us to the county line, pointed us toward home and dared us to come back without money.
He really did it because there was a big tropical storm coming and we were sleeping in the dunes. We were down there living like that for 2 weeks, they knew we were there and he knew we would get beat up badly, out in a storm like that.
It was a small town and things were very different then. So, I don't consider that as really being in jail. And my 3 friends were all avowed hetero types, so there was no sodomy that night either. But, one of them did join the Navy, and become a nuke sub sailor, so the jury may still be out on him. All I know is, he never tried to kiss me.
That entire conversation devolved and took a turn which I won't comment on. Nowithstanding, none of that detracts from the horrific crime perpetrated against 2 human beings for no justifiable reason what-so-ever.
Well, Bill, some people fail to read, and digest the comments, before making further or counter comments. Generally, then, those comments are off center or off key.
Anons comment seemed to fit that type designation. I was attempting to set him / her straight.
And your right, it's amazingly horrible. It's this kind of thing that makes me question those who say,
.
.
"There ain't no God and there ain't no Devil either."
.
.
HOW in the hell, can anyone see this kind of crime, and NOT believe in absolute evil. In my mind, only someone driven by absolute evil could conceive of this kind of crime, put a crew together to commit the crime and THEN carry it out to the end. This took twisted planning. You don't just suddenly decide to carjack two people, commit robbery, rape and murder, while sitting at a stop light, or in the shower.
Go back to the mug shots, take a look at their eyes.
These people have checked the f*#k out of the human race. As Poots said, sub-human.
Charlie Manson has that same look. Go find pictures of them online. Look at their eyes, same look as this Knoxville crowd E. Vill. That's demonic possession, no doubt in my mind. I truly believe that the eyes are the gateway to the soul, that's one way we "know" when someone's lying to us, the eyes.
But with people like these, the lights are on, but nobody's home!
I don't think it is necessary to have a belief in God or a devil to explain good or evil. Some who devote their lives to God and to good...well, good. Those who are inherentlyevil usually believe in nothing and are merely spinal animals with bad chemicals coursing through their systems. the truly evil ones are the ones who defend these monsters just to make money. The same folks who point their crooked fingers at entrepreneurs and proclaim profit is evil.
"I don't think it is necessary to have a belief in God or a devil to explain good or evil."
This my friend, is where we'll agree to disagree then.
My friends are leaving out that 3rd kind of person. Not the good, or the bad, or even the truly evil. I'm talking about the kind who just doesn't care. It's that 3rd catagory that most black street criminals fall into. And i'm not saying that simply to be racially offensive. It's just the way it is. Black criminals don't care about life. Not yours. Not even their own.
I've dealt with hundreds of black street criminals who committed all kinds of heinous crimes, some similar to this one, and yes, some even worse. (involving children) The one trait they all had in common was they didn't care one bit what happened to their victims, or themselves. There's no one more dangerous than someone who "truly" doesn't care.
Spider: see my reference to "spinal animals"
I agree Billy. Remember, more people have been killed, and continue to be killed, in the name of God than for all other reasons combined.
Spider,
I agree, but saying "black" negates all the worthless MFers of other races, who likewise don't care.
But, unless they have a certifiable medical or chemical reason for being that callous about life or lives, it has always registered as evil to me. And that includes during the time when I was so smart and so well informed, that I openly mocked the possibility of a God. There was evil, but I thought man was creative enough that he could create the evil we see in this case. I no longer believe man capable, on his own, to be that evil without prodding.
I'm beyond that kind of sophomoric discourse now.
I believe in a God who endows us with intelligence who also created beings who rebelled and serve as open adversaries toward him. Combining our intelligence and demonic evil is how, IMHO, you get these subhuman pieces of trash to commit such crimes.
That may make me seem like less to some of you, but oh well. I'm not in life for your approval anyway.
They still need to turn "mom" loose on these animals. I'd pay to watch. HBO could get way out of debt on a few of these.
Steve, it's not nearly as profound as you make it seem. And God has nothing to do with it. I know what truly evil people are like, and IMO, it stems from upbringing and genetics. And, of the thousands of serious crimes i've investigated, there is no comparison when it comes to the level of brutality used by White criminals as compared to black ones. Blacks are "far more" brutal, and that includes crimes committed against their own kind. Although in recent years, hispanic criminals have actually surpassed blacks when it comes to brutality and "not caring".
When a black criminal is on the street "stalking", they are already resigned to the fact that they will either end-up in jail, or dead. The White criminal (does not apply to foreign Whites) is only wondering if he'll get enough to pay a lawyer.
Perhaps it's the "despair" that comes from growing-up poor? (which to me is just a bullshit excuse) Or perhaps, it's the despair that comes from outside forces (bleeding hearts) telling you that the whole White world is picking on you and owes you a good life. Whatever the reason, black street criminals just don't care whether they live or die. And, if they don't care about their own lives, what chance does the victim have.
Post a Comment