.
We have often commented here, and elsewhere, that Liberal Democrats have an aversion to Truth, Justice and the American Way. Especially, the truth part of that.
.
This week, in a mostly hidden story, it was slipped that Harry Reid told the TRUTH about what he thought of Barack Obama being elected as POTUS. And when he was reported as having told the truth, he backed away from his statements. Guess why? Because his remarks were "racially insensitive".
.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid went into damage control over the weekend, mobilizing a raft of supportive statements both in Washington, D.C., and Nevada after news broke that during the 2008 presidential campaign he said Barack Obama had an advantage because he's "light-skinned" and has "no Negro dialect" unless he wants to employ it.
.
I don't see where that statement is wrong, untruthful, or "racially insensitive". Let's say, for instance, that the Democrats had been pushing someone who is the very antithesis of Mr. Obama. Suppose that INSTEAD of the tall, well spoken and ONLY HALF AFRICAN AMERICAN Mr. Obama, just suppose, the democrats had run for POTUS candidate William Drayton Jr.?
.
Perhaps Mr. Drayton would have made a better President than Mr. Obama, and here's how. Drayton is well known to most Americans, before he began his run, most of us had never heard of Obama. Mr. Drayton has a huge following in the African American community and among young white Americans, Mr. Obama did not. Mr. Drayton is a known successful entrepreneur, and he's been a spokesmen for various causes that benefit the urban centers of America, Mr. Obama was ONLY working in Chicago. Mr. Obama has been accused of being late or slow to act, where as Mr. Drayton is known for his timepiece.
.
However, it occurs to me that many of us wouldn't know Mr. Drayton by his given name, but, then again, we didn't know 'Barry' Obama to start with either. I guess if you don't know Mr. Drayton, you can look at his page over at IMDb. Then you can decide who would make the better leader of the free world, Mr. Drayton, or Mr. Obama. But remember, Mr. Obama is tall, educated, well spoken and light skinned, Mr. Drayton most decidely is NONE of those things.
.
But I digress and too long from my original point, Harry Reid spoke the truth as he sees it, but because the subject of that truth is half-NEGRO, he had to retract the statement so the PCascists could sleep again. And might I add, what a crock of horseshit, that is, BO-EEE!!
.
OH, and Here is Mr. Drayton's page.
.
UPDATE: Michael Steele says Dems and MSM have a dual standard and the Harry Reid remarks prove it. I think Steele needs to go anyway, but saying this NOW further proves it. Steele, as I see it, is leader of the Day Late and a Dollar Short Club, and again, the fact that he waited for this situation to accuse the Democrats and the MSM of lying and collusion.
.
.
MC Schteveo Yo!
4 comments:
Stevie, i agree with you about Michael Steele. I have yet to see him do anything.
As for Reid, i think he should be forced to step down from his position. Not only because of what he said, but just to break his bal (oops) chops and screw up their plans. Remember Trent Lott? They forced him out as majority leader for saying something that was a lot less offensive than what Reid said. No opportunity to throw a monkey wrench into their gears should be missed.
Spider,
that's exactly the situation I thought of. Lott makes a joke and gets blown out of the water. The PCascists "thought' it was racist, so there was no way to get away from it.
Reid says something they "think" was racist, but it's mostly hidden from the public and there's not an inch high wave over it from the PC crowd. It's GD galling to me and I'm actually so GD sick of it, I could puke!! Why isn't every elected Republican in D.C. screaming for his head on a platter!!??
These SOBs need to go, there needs to be a wholesale removal of almost everyone who is elected OR who has been "on the staff" in D.C. more than 2 years. New elected officials and old guard "Congressional Staff" is BS, they gotta go, because the staff helps corrupt the new members. AX 'EM ALL.
You're right Steve. This entire govt needs to be changed, (or IMO, brought down, run out of town, hanged, etc.) including these young staff people, who are the ones who really run this country. And, if the American people had anything to say about it, it would be changed. But they don't.
In fact, i made a dinner bet with a friend. I said that IMO, the mid-term elections will not produce enough change to cause anything to really change in DC. We'll see.
Holy crap do I hope you lose that bet!!
Post a Comment