AZ is going all out with their new immigration law. And because of it, TX is considering a similar law. But it's making the hispanics mad, especially the illegal ones.
.
Now I ask you, IF these sign carriers ARE legal, WHY are they hiding their faces? Did any of US [spelled U.S.] go to the Tea Party events and HIDE our FACES? Hell, I didn't HIDE my GUN!!
.
But I digress. Due to the new AZ law, hispanics from 70 cities are planning marches and boycotts. Personally I want to hold marches and boycotts for...speeders, or....litterers, or...pick pockets. If we're supporting illegal activity, I think we need to at least support illegal activities that don't cost us MONEY at the levels the illegal IMMIGRANTS cost us.
.
And how come only illegal hispanics bitch and complain? We never hear from illegal Canadians, or illegal Greeks, or illegal Nigerians, or even illegal Norwegians? Could it be that they are smart enough to shut the hell up, or is that they don't have a big enough voting block to feel safe?
.
Here's why we never hear from illegal prairie dogs.
.
.
Schteveo
9 comments:
Yes you do have rights. Basic human rights. now go home
Illegals, or prairie dogs...I'm confused?
And BTW, there is no such thing as human rights, we all have INDIVIDUAL rights. I just learned that this term, "human rights", is straight out of the secular humanist / socialist / progressive / communist handbooks.
In the Constitution it says that "all men" are endowed, that means as individuals, NOT as a group. Yeah, I agree it sounds like nit picking, but give it some thought. It's exactly the kind of niggling, word twisting that "those other people" do to undermine our TRUE rights.
the commie handbook actually would refer to "states' rights". A state can't have rights, only individuals can. My reference to "human rights" refers to people as individuals. I hope that clears it up for you
I want to march for prostitutes. Not the skanky streetwalker types, but the hot pornstar type.
I just got back from a week down south and i've been watching this debate. First, i think the gov of AZ did the right thing for the law abiding citizens of AZ. That's her job. As expected, all the professional race pimps and illegal advocates are going balistic, which should tell you that it was a good move on the gov's part.
I couldn't help but notice that they're calling it a "race" issue, (including Fox) when it is clearly not. Mexicans are not a race, they are a nationality. Of course, injecting race into it just makes for more headlines. It is also (IMO) not a federal matter, since this law is designed to protect the people of AZ, not the country.
Obviously, this is all headed for the SCOTUS. If they knock it down, we'll need a million troops on the border to stop the tsunami of illegals who will see it as a free pass.
I'll accept that. I've been fighting with local commies / progressives and I'm all wound up over who, what, how, we get rights.
Spider,
if the articles I'm reading are right, they've worded this to AUGMENT the existing Federal laws, not supersede or go beyond the powers granted within the ICE / Local LEO situation. If the reports are right, the majority of the badge carriers in AZ, have been through the training that allows them to arrest, hold and question the illegals. Like most everywhere else, there have been myriad questions about when 'who(m)' can do 'what'. In AZ it's been clarified.
I might move.
(no comments about those poor prairie dogs yet? I'm let down where's that hand wringer when we need his foolishness)(Bill, call Janice will ya', I need to tweak someone those prairie dog murderers should have done it by now)
Mexico...I don't get this....Uh...they have: gold, silver, great climate, beaches, fertile land...
so why don't they do something with it?
Instead, they are supporting and exporting their misery to us. Why? How about they take control of their own country? Instead they blame....let me see....hmmm...us?
Okay. ...we are expected to be bi-lingual, multilingual. No one spoke English to me on my trips to Mexico....unless they wanted dinero, uh, money
I have a simple solution to this entire problem. Since our immigration laws are an obvious joke, mostly because no one is allowed to enforce them, why don't we adopt Mexico's immigration policies and laws? That should make the 40+ Million illegal Mex's here happy, since they are already familiar with those laws. Of course, it would mean they all get deported within 48 hours.
But in order to make any immigration policy work, the so-called "anchor-baby" rule (must be) overturned, and the Demoncrat who invented it publicly hanged. Without removing that hideous law, nothing will change.
Post a Comment