Concerning my Dog

.

IN RESPONSE TO ALL THE EMAILS CONCERNING MY DOG.

Please be advised I am sick and tired of receiving questions about my dog, who mauled six illegal aliens wearing Obama tee shirts, plus four wearing Pelosi tee shirts, two rappers, nine teenagers with pants hanging down past their cracks, eight customer-service-desk people speaking in broken English, three flag burners, and a illegal Pakistani taxi driver.

FOR THE LAST TIME... THE DOG IS NOT FOR SALE !!! And before the PETA people start 'barking', I'M TRYING TO TALK HIM INTO QUITTING SMOKING, BUT HE SAYS IT HELPS GET THE BAD TASTE OUT OF HIS MOUTH!

.
.
Schteveo

And Now, The Facts

Physicist Analyzes Sandra Fluke's Birth Control Expenses:

"Great analysis? You don't want to give a study topic like this one to a physicist or statistician for analysis, both will include some humor and of course definitive answers. Unfortunately many Americans don't understand that she was an Obama planted testifier and do not have the smarts!?Leave it to a physicist to find a solution to Ms. Fluke's conundrum. Since Ms. Fluke was an obvious shill for the Obama administration, it demonstrates why we are in the economic straits that are sinking our ship of state. They just don't understand numbers.Many of you have likely seen the heart rending testimony of Ms. Sandra Fluke, a law student at Georgetown University, before a Congressional Committee this week. She was lamenting that no one would subsidize her birth control expenses, which she claimed would amount to $3000 during her three years in law school. After watching Ms. Fluke describe her desperate situation I set to thinking of ways to help her out of her crisis.

First, of course I had to pass through the grieving period I experienced after hearing of her inhumane treatment at the hands of the Georgetown administration and our government – what cruelty lurks in the heart of men that they would leave this poor woman to fend for herself when all she wanted to do was get laid seven times a day (see my analysis below). Once I recovered from my grief, I set to thinking about ways to help this poor girl. Being a physicist, I sat down with my calculator and worked through some numbers. Ms. Fluke's expense account for birth control (aka sexual entertainment) was claimed to be $3000 for three years at law school. Let's presume that as an educated woman she wants to be doubly safe and uses both birth control pills to prevent pregnancy and condoms to prevent STD (sexually transmitted disease).

Using the Wal-Mart cost for birth control pills of $9 per month, her birth control pills will cost her $324 for her entire law school career (if you can call it a career – I can think of other names). This leaves only $2676 for her condoms. I went to Amazon.com, and found quality condoms available for 33 cents each in packages of 60 condoms each. This cost includes tax and shipping. Since she has $2676 for her 33 cent condoms, she will be buying 8109 condoms during her law school "career". To use her 8109 condoms (remember, $3000 was Ms. Flukes' own number) she would have to have sex 7 times a day. This number presumes that she has sex ten times a day on Sundays when she has more free time. So, having worked through these numbers, I have some suggestions for Ms. Fluke to help her work through her crisis:

1. Find dates who are gentlemanly enough to either provide their own condoms, or at least split the cost with her. Selection criteria is the key to this one.

2. Spend more time studying. Even seven "quickies" a day will seriously cut into quality study time. This would not only save money but would improve her education as well.

3. Seek funding from the EPA from one of their Wetlands Protection programs – surely Ms. Flukes' nether regions would qualify as wetlands given sex seven times a day.

Just trying to help out a starving student. By the way, the average starting salary of new Georgetown Law School graduates is $160,000 a year..."


Borrowed from the wild minds at PIG...

Control Their Minds

I once read a quote that said, "to conquer a nation without the use of military force, you must first control the minds of their young..."

It's a pretty interesting theory, assuming you had the time (several generations) it would take to accomplish it. It's surely easier and cheaper than putting many fully equipped armies in the field. Of course, your cause would need a large number of dedicated sympathizers (see: useful idiots) in your enemies country. But, IMO, if you had them in place, (as we do) over time, you could win, especially if your enemy is a case study in weakness...... BTW, the above quote was from, Karl Marx...

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/out_of_the_question_YegJJGCOo33j0CQsccdZuL

Does He Know Something We Don't?

Does the Mullah-in-Chief already know the outcome of the 2012 elections? But wait a minute. With the fair, (cough) impartial, (cough) accurate, (cough) and highly unbiased (cough) voting system we have, how could he? Forgive me, must be allergies. Then again, with what the Republicans are offering and how they're carrying on, does it take a genius to see what's coming?

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/03/26/obama-tells-medvedev-hell-have-more-flexibility-after-election-during-missile/

BHO! The 'flexible' President!

Many of the talking heads from the Right have warned that IF he is re-elected, President Obumble will see his second term as a no holds barred situation, where he can do anything he wants. Of course, his minions and the DNC say that's just not so and not his way.
.
I'm throwing the BS flag on this one!!!
.
And here's my reasoning. The President told Russian President Medvedev that if they'll wait until AFTER the election, to talk about the Missile Defense Treaty, he [Obama] will have more FLEXIBILITY, in dealing with them. This is in his own words, recorded, not some minion 'misspeaking' the President's word or meanings.
.
Send THIS to all your fence sitting friends. Perhaps it will help them decide who to vote for come November.
.
.
Schteveo

2 for one

AND:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z6QOscKvUjU

Friday Funnies

John O'Reilly hoisted his beer and said, "Here's to spending the rest of me life, between the legs of me wife!"

That won him the top prize at the pub for the best toast of the night !

He went home and told his wife, Mary, "I won the prize for the Best toast of The night."

She said, "Aye, did ye now. And what was your toast?"

John said, "Here's to spending the rest of me life, sitting in church beside me wife."

"Oh, that is very nice indeed, John!" Mary said.

The next day, Mary ran into one of John's drinking buddies on the street corner. The man chuckled leeringly and said, "John won the prize the other night at The pub with a toast about you, Mary."

She said, "Aye, he told me, and I was a bit surprised myself. You know, he's only been in there twice in the last four years. Once I had to pull him by the ears to make him come, and the other time he fell asleep…"

Blatant Indoctrination

A Virginia middle school teacher is under fire after making his students do "opposition research" on Republican presidential candidates, according to a report.

Eighth-graders at Liberty Middle School in Fairfax County were assigned to research the backgrounds and positions of Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul and find any "weaknesses," according to The Daily Caller.

The students were then required to draft a strategy paper, mapping out how to exploit those weaknesses and then research how to forward it to the Obama campaign. "This assignment was just creepy beyond belief -- like something out of East Germany during the Cold War," a father of one of the students who asked for anonymity told The Daily Caller. The teacher, Michael Denman, gave the assignment to his Civics honors class, which he broke up into four groups, with each one assigned a GOP candidate to investigate.

"My classmates don't actually know a lot, but a few of us tended to agree that the most recent instruction on this project just didn't seem right," one of the students told the news website. Mr. Denman didn't tell us where to find the information, just to research on them."

John Torre, a spokesman on behalf of the Fairfax County Public School system, told The Daily Caller that students were never instructed to actually send their results to the Obama campaign. "Instead, the teacher simply asked his students to find out the name of the office that would receive such information," Torre wrote in an email to the news site. Torre said the school's principal discussed the matter with Denman, and told him students should have been given a choice to research candidates from either major party... (From Fox News)


"To conquer a nation without the use of military force, you must first control the minds of their young..." --- Karl Marx

Aww, How Nice

Thinking about taking the family away on vacation? To Mexico perhaps? Sorry, the US State Dept. has warned Americans to avoid Mexico at all costs. Of course, if your family members are all heavily-armed Navy SEALS, or if you want to get rid of them, Mexico is the place for you, assuming you can afford the trip since you've lost your job, your home, and you will soon need a mask and gun to get some gas for your car.

Apparently, it's also the place for one of Obummer's daughters and a bunch of her school pals. You see, that's where they are taking their spring break. (aww...) And unlike you and your family, she has a small army of Secret Service agents, armored helicopters, gunships, armored limos, and God only knows what else, just to make sure they all have fun. Ain't that nice? I wonder how many of your mortgage payments, tuition payments, or late loan payments could be payed for with the cost of this vacation.

Apparently, there's also a bit of mystery surrounding this trip which is being paid for by all the usual idiots. (a.k.a. taxpayers) It seems the facts of this trip are being scrubbed clean from the entire Internet! Several major news outlets have deleted the story from their websites faster than you can say, " Mr. Editor, there's a call from the WH for you". Hmm...

http://www.montrealgazette.com/travel/Obama+daughter+spends+spring+break+Mexico/6323773/story.html

Acceptable Racism

So, what would happen if Rush Limbaugh or Newt Gingrich said, "it's too soon to have another black First Lady "? Riots? Protests? Media hysteria and outrage? Calls for firings? Most likely all of the above.

Well, that's what famous Commiewood actor Robert DeNiro said at a Obummer fund raiser held in one of his restaurants with fat-ass Michelle sitting there. He was speaking to a bunch of his Leftist pals in Manhattan, one of the country's major Leftist strongholds. Now, i don't know about you guys, but i haven't seen nor heard a word about this on any news show today, so i have to assume his remark was not seen as racist, as it surely would have been seen if said by any Republican or Conservative. Apparently, DeNiro's black wife, and his left-wing, socialist roots (both his parents were noted socialists) give him immunity. How nice...


http://www.politico.com/blogs/click/2012/03/de-niro-too-soon-for-another-white-first-lady-117982.html

National Socialism comes to the U.S.A.

Achtung!!! On March 16th, 2012, President Barack Obama made himself Führer over the U.S., by saying we needed a plan for National Defense. He signed an Executive Order, saying so!
.

NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

PART I - PURPOSE, POLICY, AND IMPLEMENTATION

Section 101. Purpose. This order delegates authorities and addresses national defense resource policies and programs under the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (the "Act").

Sec. 102. Policy. The United States must have an industrial and technological base capable of meeting national defense requirements and capable of contributing to the technological superiority of its national defense equipment in peacetime and in times of national emergency. The domestic industrial and technological base is the foundation for national defense preparedness. The authorities provided in the Act shall be used to strengthen this base and to ensure it is capable of responding to the national defense needs of the United States.

Sec. 103. General Functions. Executive departments and agencies (agencies) responsible for plans and programs relating to national defense (as defined in section 801(j) of this order), or for resources and services needed to support such plans and programs, shall:

(a) identify requirements for the full spectrum of emergencies, including essential military and civilian demand;

(b) assess on an ongoing basis the capability of the domestic industrial and technological base to satisfy requirements in peacetime and times of national emergency, specifically evaluating the availability of the most critical resource and production sources, including subcontractors and suppliers, materials, skilled labor, and professional and technical personnel;

You can read the rest of it HERE. But just how far do the sheople have to get pushed, before they get pushed too far? I'm betting most of them didn't even hear about this. They sure as hell won't hear it on the Big 3 News, that's for damned sure!

When I told Mrs. Schteveo about this she said it will only work IF 'they' take all the ammo and guns! (she's coming around) I ordered more ammo today, and I'm headed out tomorrow to buy a .22 rifle. I can buy a ton of 22LR, cheap, cheap, cheap as dirt.
.
Food I'll just keep stocking. What are YOU doing?
.
.
Schteveo

Free Country? Think Again

"Last week, President Obama signed into law the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. This law permits Secret Service agents to designate any place they wish as a place where free speech, association and petition of the government are prohibited. And it permits the Secret Service to make these determinations based on the content of speech.
Thus, federal agents whose work is to protect public officials and their friends may prohibit the speech and the gatherings of folks who disagree with those officials or permit the speech and the gatherings of those who would praise them, even though the First Amendment condemns content-based speech discrimination by the government.

The new law also provides that anyone who gathers in a "restricted" area may be prosecuted. And because the statute does not require the government to prove intent, a person accidentally in a restricted area can be charged and prosecuted, as well. Permitting people to express publicly their opinions to the president only at a time and in a place and manner such that he cannot hear them violates the First Amendment because it guarantees the right to useful speech; and unheard political speech is politically useless. The same may be said of the rights to associate and to petition. If peaceful public assembly and public expression of political demands on the government can be restricted to places where government officials cannot be confronted, then those rights, too, have been neutered.

Political speech is in the highest category of protected speech. This is not about drowning out the president in the Oval Office. This is about letting him know what we think of his work when he leaves the White House. This is speech intended to influence the political process.

This abominable legislation enjoyed "overwhelming support from (both) political parties in Congress " because the establishment loves power, fears dissent and hates inconvenience, and it doesn't give a damn about the Constitution. It passed the Senate by unanimous consent, and only three members of the House voted against it. And the president signed it in secret. It is more typical of contemporary China than America. It is more George III than George Washington.

The whole purpose of the First Amendment is to assure open, wide, robust, uninhibited political debate, debate that can be seen and heard by those it seeks to challenge and influence, whether it is convenient for them or not. Anything short of that turns the First Amendment into a mirage..."

--- Judge Andrew Napolitano, Fox News...

That's Enough!

So now, the Marxist-in-Chief is considering getting us involved militarily in Syria, assuming we're not already involved. As someone who was/is totally against us getting involved in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, and God-only-knows where else, i say, why? Why should we be involved in what appears to me to be an armed insurrection/revolution in Syria? Is it because Assad is killing the armed revolutionaries? So what! Or, maybe it's because Mullah Obummer wants to open yet another country to his brothers in the Mooselamb Brotherhood? He's already given them Egypt, Iraq, and Lybia.

Back when president GWNitwit thought it would be nice to attack a country that did absolutely nothing to us, i said, "hey Mr. Nitwit, you're attacking the wrong country! Our real enemy is Iran, not Iraq! In fact, you could use Saddam and his big military as the spear-point to attack the country that we really should be worried about." The Iraqi's would've loved the opportunity to fight their hated enemies. Of course, once they get their nuke, they become untouchables. That's assuming the Israeli's are dumb enough to listen to Obummer. As for Afghanistan, for all we've accomplished there, we could've done the same thing and paid them back for 9/11 with air power alone. We have the means. Unfortunately, my memo to the WH apparently didn't arrive.

I've said it before and i'll say it again. If our brave and dedicated warriors are to be used to protect our country from a genuine threat, they should be guarding our southern border, (this time armed) because IMO, the threats coming from Mexico are far greater to our national security than any coming from the Middle East...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/293103/let-syria-be-andrew-c-mccarthy

Finally !!

Well, it seems that a Republican member of congress has finally had enough of seeing the Constitution violated by the Marxist-in-Chief, and has introduced a resolution calling for, (gulp) IMPEACHMENT! That it is, so far, only one Republican should remind a lot of us that the Repubs aren't very different from the Demoncrats, except they're a whole lot weaker. Loud demands for Obummer's impeachment should have been sounded when he first started showing signs that he had no intention of honoring the Constitution, congress, the law, or the will of the people. In fact, this may turn out to be, (IMO) "the most" lawless presidency in our history. He has managed to do this much damage to our country, and last this long, thanks to a weak, gullible, and mindless population, one being routinely anesthetized by the MSM. Look for that same MSM to launch a campaign mocking this congressman and his resolution. They know it doesn't take much to manipulate the opinions of the sheep.

And if that's not enough, there's Sheriff Joe waiting in the wings with, i hope, a pair of handcuffs...


http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/obama-impeachment-bill-now-in-congress/?cat_orig=us

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/07-03-2012/120708-arizona_sheriff_obama-0/

Obama's Record on Israel

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wbH5KVPrPo&feature=youtu.be