Monday, March 12, 2012

That's Enough!

So now, the Marxist-in-Chief is considering getting us involved militarily in Syria, assuming we're not already involved. As someone who was/is totally against us getting involved in Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia, and God-only-knows where else, i say, why? Why should we be involved in what appears to me to be an armed insurrection/revolution in Syria? Is it because Assad is killing the armed revolutionaries? So what! Or, maybe it's because Mullah Obummer wants to open yet another country to his brothers in the Mooselamb Brotherhood? He's already given them Egypt, Iraq, and Lybia.

Back when president GWNitwit thought it would be nice to attack a country that did absolutely nothing to us, i said, "hey Mr. Nitwit, you're attacking the wrong country! Our real enemy is Iran, not Iraq! In fact, you could use Saddam and his big military as the spear-point to attack the country that we really should be worried about." The Iraqi's would've loved the opportunity to fight their hated enemies. Of course, once they get their nuke, they become untouchables. That's assuming the Israeli's are dumb enough to listen to Obummer. As for Afghanistan, for all we've accomplished there, we could've done the same thing and paid them back for 9/11 with air power alone. We have the means. Unfortunately, my memo to the WH apparently didn't arrive.

I've said it before and i'll say it again. If our brave and dedicated warriors are to be used to protect our country from a genuine threat, they should be guarding our southern border, (this time armed) because IMO, the threats coming from Mexico are far greater to our national security than any coming from the Middle East...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/293103/let-syria-be-andrew-c-mccarthy

16 comments:

stinkinrottenkid said...

Nuke 'em all

Anonymous said...

I gotta tell you, I always thought the Iraq / Afghan thing was a lead up to going into Iran. It made sense. But it didn't happen.

(I still need someone to send me a new invite to be an author. I lost me old HDD and all the passwords with it. Thanx)

Schteveo

Spider said...

LMK how to do that bud and i'll send you one.

stinkinrottenkid said...

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid949801312001?bckey=AQ~~,AAAACEco_Vk~,9bOat4XcfB_88ri1a3UMdKnLpH9aM8Fv&bctid=1271237687001

Living to cap muzlimz said...

I'm for any enterprise that kills muslims. Personally I enjoy muslims killing other muslims (must be a real mind fuck for allah to decide who to maryter). We should just send them a lot of guns and napalm. Maybe a bunch a left over flame throwers as well plus some anthrax.

Anonymous said...

Best idea i've ever heard! Hey, wanna be secretary of state?

Muslim Capper said...

I wanna be secretary of killing MUSLIMS

Anonymous said...

...and that would make you different than THEM how?

Ever heard of a group called the Kurds? Muslim to about 98%. But they HATE the Taliban & AQ. They fight AGAINST radicals and radical, clerical leaning countries like Saddam's Iraq, current Iran, Syria, Turkey. In ALL the provinces of Iraq and Afghanistan, the ONLY place our guys could go unarmed, with NO flak jackets, was the Kurdish homeland around Erbil.

GWB, and Colin Powell, HUNG them OUT to dry after they revolted against Saddam in the 90's, and they STILL aligned with US when we went back in there.

Do you want to kill THEM too? The only true Muslim allies we have in the M.E.?

Or is it ALL talk and B.S.?

'cause frankly, it's gettin' old. We're the fucking good guys, until we start racial massacres anyway.

Scteveo

Schteveo said...

Thanks to the diligence of stinkingrottenkid, I'm bbbbaaaaccckkk!!

Korans 4 TP said...

Want to kill ALL MUSLIMS.

Anonymous said...

Schteveo said;
"Do you want to kill THEM too? The only true Muslim allies we have in the M.E.?"

KILL 'EM ALL AND LET GOD SORT THEM OUT!

Anonymous said...

Want kill all

Schteveo said...

Nothing like a clear concise, reasoned rebuttal.

Musliminator Poot said...

Rarely get confused that way

Spider said...

Steve, IMO, there are "many" people who have a very clear concise and rational and logical thought when they realize the sad truth, which is, in the end, it will either be radical Islam, or the rest of us. We now know (or should know) enough about radical Islam to know that for many of them, there can be, nor will there be, no other outcome.

So the question becomes rather simple. Do we win, or do we lose/bend/talk/surrender/compromise,etc? History has shown us what societies look like after they lose to Islam. I for one would much rather see us do that to them than the other way around.

There are thousands of examples throughout history which show us that unfortunately, to achieve a peaceful life, we must first destroy and eliminate those who want total control instead of peace. And, since we've been down this road before, (Germany, Japan, etc.) there's plenty of recent evidence to prove the above. The only difference is that we have never faced an enemy this dangerous nor this dedicated to our destruction. That one fact alone should tell us that when dealing with them, the gloves must come off and the rule book must go out the window.

Less talk, more lead said...

Kwitcher yappin, an gitchu cappin. Boy.