Here is just one of several articles on the forced acceptance of homosexual marriage by a federally appointed...not elected....judge.
It is ironic that the 3rd amendment to the Utah State Constitution, which defines marriage as being between a man and a woman, has been declared unconstitutional.
What is ironic about it you ask? Well , the fact that in 1898 the state of Utah was forced to included in its constitution, in order to become a state, that it only recognized the "traditional definition of marriage"
So, over the course of 115 years a group of people have been forced by politicians to abandon a portion of their religious freedom (good bye 1st amendment) and forced to accept what they consider to be a sinful act (goodbye 9th & 10th amendments).
Just out of curiosity, I wonder if it is that same "group" that has done both? It isn't so much about condoning a particular lifestyle as it is about forcing others to abandon theirs.