I can't wait to hear how A-hole, I mean our guest Anon spins this
The current owners of the Empire State Building refuse to light the building to honor what would have been Mother Theresa's 100th Birthday, but these same folks honored the communist chinese a few months ago.
I visited the Empire State Building once. It was old and rundown. Like a piece of Detroit. I was actually disappointed. The elevator operator was about 70 and I heard he had been working the job since the early 50s. I bet he made more than the average... dentist. :-)
As for them not recognizing Mother Teresa - no NY doorman or elevator operator would - I don't think she tipped.
On the more serious side, this is expected of silly liberals who hate God and love communists. I'm not surprised in the least. I bet Google doesn't recognizer her either.
That's okay. Those who don't recognize good will not be recognized at the Pearly Gates and so shall be turned away. Seems like I read that somewhere. :-)
You see, where Mother Teresa went wrong - she was supposed to do nothing except pay her taxes to the liberals so the liberals could keep 75% and use the rest to "help" the poor. She makes them look bad. Liberals hate real charity as much as they hate God.
Don't you people have anything better to do than seek out trivial things to be outraged over?
I'm sure they decided not to honor the dead nun because they're bad liberals who would rather honor murderous commies than the kindly nun. See, that's how liberals are. They honor the bad people and punish the good ones. It's all so unfair!
There, happier now? Does that fit your white trash victimhood-seeking narrative/worldview?
Mother Teresa was a liberal. If she had run for office you would have called her a whore who only helped the poor for her own gain. If she were dying in the street you'd step over her and curse the goddamned homeless trash that litter your streets. If she was starving, a conservative would shit on his excess food rather than share it with her.
funny thing, yes she was a "liberal" meaning that she wanted to help the downtrodden in any way that she could if that is what you mean by liberal. The difference between her and most liberals in this country is that --SHE-- wanted to help people, not spend other peoples' money to have somebody else help other people.
She never ran for office because she was not self serving (name me a politician who isn't)
Although I can think of things to criticize the woman about, it all pales in comparison to what she ACTUALLY DID.
Fast tracking her to sainthood...seems kind of popularist. But I will never deny that she did something good, which is far and above what I can say for most liberal politicians. The closest they come to actually "doing good" is stealing money from workers and giving it to non-workers. The sad thing is these same politicians claim to be for the workers....they are supported by "worker" unions. Again, my befuddled little brain can't understand how I can pay a union dues to represent me or pay the union to not represent me...either way I pay the union, they pay the politician, and I live in a ramshackle hovel so that I can afford to pay increased taxes to non-worker benefits.
Yes, another stupid conservative who thinks 90% of the tax they pay goes to poor blacks to have more babies.
You people have ridden that wave for what, 50 years or so? Ever get tired of it?
I guess if you can convince yourself that all the tax you pay goes to buy malt liquor and cigarettes for the negroes then it justifies your desire to stop paying to support the society whose resources and services you use so enthusiastically.
Of course, when those services are not found by you, you whine and bitch till the cows come home.
I could really care less if those in charge of such things as this care to "honor" a Catholic nun who gave of her self to help the "untouchable", but it did bother me that they would "honor" the take over of China by a thug that killed around 20-60 million people.
I suppose that Mao is a "god" to this anonymous dumbfuck that likes to project his, her, or "it's" own problems onto those that just want to shoot some shit and talk about happenings the world over.
I read and re-read the comments and just can't see where this dumbshit racist fucking commie found the racist angle, therefor I must believe that he, she or it was just projecting their own hatred and bias on those they disagree with.
I remember when once upon a time the occaisional progressive would happen upon this site and present an opposing point of view in an engaging and at least some what literate manner. Alas, this "anonymous" has not the ability nor the cahones for any thing other than adhominen attacks against straw men and the vast right wing conspiracy that keeps him from truly living the life of a slave to the "state" that he, she or it so desires.
Bend over anonymous, big brother has a "thing" for you.
I love when you people make outlandish claims of "20-60 million" politically motivated murders. The numbers keep going up. Of course they're all lies but that never stopped you before!
This site is filled with racism, subtle and not-so-subtle.
Actually anonymarxist, that 20-60 million figure I threw out is due to the fact that I often see those numbers in "mainstream" media publications.
I have no doubt that in his time Mao was responsible for many millions of deaths.
Pol Pot killed a few million and he only had a few years of power to do it. So to believe the likes of Mao and Stalin could reach and even exceed 10 million or more does not seem that brazen a guess to me.
And my black, conservative girlfriend says that you are defenitely racist, she can "smell" it in your ignorant rants.
Ok, so now it's 10 million? LOL, I don't believe you people even think about the crap you spout!
Know this: The only election yesterday between a dem and a repub, PA-12, went to the dem even AFTER the republicans spent 1/10 of their cash on hand on the race and other con groups spent another $500,000. $1.5 million to lose a race that will be up for grabs again in 5 months!
That doesn't bode well for republicans in November.
My black, handicapped, jewish, liberal boyfriend says so.
Is this another example of Anon showing his bias, racism and hatred?
If you are referring to my post, which line did I mention blacks, babies, malt or tobacco? Where did I mention any percentage of tax? Is your rant your own view or your own biased perception of your self created stereo type? I am honestly at a loss at how my comments could offend anyone except someone looking to be offended.
12 comments:
here's the rink. crick my name
I visited the Empire State Building once. It was old and rundown. Like a piece of Detroit. I was actually disappointed. The elevator operator was about 70 and I heard he had been working the job since the early 50s. I bet he made more than the average... dentist. :-)
As for them not recognizing Mother Teresa - no NY doorman or elevator operator would - I don't think she tipped.
On the more serious side, this is expected of silly liberals who hate God and love communists. I'm not surprised in the least. I bet Google doesn't recognizer her either.
That's okay. Those who don't recognize good will not be recognized at the Pearly Gates and so shall be turned away. Seems like I read that somewhere. :-)
You see, where Mother Teresa went wrong - she was supposed to do nothing except pay her taxes to the liberals so the liberals could keep 75% and use the rest to "help" the poor. She makes them look bad. Liberals hate real charity as much as they hate God.
Down home, Texican common sense once again from my friend Jimbo.
Kudos bud, I cannot top your blurb, so I simply salute you.
But you can bet they would be happy to celebrate Motha Fcuka day!
Don't you people have anything better to do than seek out trivial things to be outraged over?
I'm sure they decided not to honor the dead nun because they're bad liberals who would rather honor murderous commies than the kindly nun. See, that's how liberals are. They honor the bad people and punish the good ones. It's all so unfair!
There, happier now? Does that fit your white trash victimhood-seeking narrative/worldview?
Mother Teresa was a liberal. If she had run for office you would have called her a whore who only helped the poor for her own gain. If she were dying in the street you'd step over her and curse the goddamned homeless trash that litter your streets. If she was starving, a conservative would shit on his excess food rather than share it with her.
funny thing, yes she was a "liberal" meaning that she wanted to help the downtrodden in any way that she could if that is what you mean by liberal. The difference between her and most liberals in this country is that --SHE-- wanted to help people, not spend other peoples' money to have somebody else help other people.
She never ran for office because she was not self serving (name me a politician who isn't)
Although I can think of things to criticize the woman about, it all pales in comparison to what she ACTUALLY DID.
Fast tracking her to sainthood...seems kind of popularist. But I will never deny that she did something good, which is far and above what I can say for most liberal politicians. The closest they come to actually "doing good" is stealing money from workers and giving it to non-workers.
The sad thing is these same politicians claim to be for the workers....they are supported by "worker" unions. Again, my befuddled little brain can't understand how I can pay a union dues to represent me or pay the union to not represent me...either way I pay the union, they pay the politician, and I live in a ramshackle hovel so that I can afford to pay increased taxes to non-worker benefits.
Yes, another stupid conservative who thinks 90% of the tax they pay goes to poor blacks to have more babies.
You people have ridden that wave for what, 50 years or so? Ever get tired of it?
I guess if you can convince yourself that all the tax you pay goes to buy malt liquor and cigarettes for the negroes then it justifies your desire to stop paying to support the society whose resources and services you use so enthusiastically.
Of course, when those services are not found by you, you whine and bitch till the cows come home.
I could really care less if those in charge of such things as this care to "honor" a Catholic nun who gave of her self to help the "untouchable", but it did bother me that they would "honor" the take over of China by a thug that killed around 20-60 million people.
I suppose that Mao is a "god" to this anonymous dumbfuck that likes to project his, her, or "it's" own problems onto those that just want to shoot some shit and talk about happenings the world over.
I read and re-read the comments and just can't see where this dumbshit racist fucking commie found the racist angle, therefor I must believe that he, she or it was just projecting their own hatred and bias on those they disagree with.
I remember when once upon a time the occaisional progressive would happen upon this site and present an opposing point of view in an engaging and at least some what literate manner. Alas, this "anonymous" has not the ability nor the cahones for any thing other than adhominen attacks against straw men and the vast right wing conspiracy that keeps him from truly living the life of a slave to the "state" that he, she or it so desires.
Bend over anonymous, big brother has a "thing" for you.
I love when you people make outlandish claims of "20-60 million" politically motivated murders. The numbers keep going up.
Of course they're all lies but that never stopped you before!
This site is filled with racism, subtle and not-so-subtle.
Actually anonymarxist, that 20-60 million figure I threw out is due to the fact that I often see those numbers in "mainstream" media publications.
I have no doubt that in his time Mao was responsible for many millions of deaths.
Pol Pot killed a few million and he only had a few years of power to do it. So to believe the likes of Mao and Stalin could reach and even exceed 10 million or more does not seem that brazen a guess to me.
And my black, conservative girlfriend says that you are defenitely racist, she can "smell" it in your ignorant rants.
Ok, so now it's 10 million? LOL, I don't believe you people even think about the crap you spout!
Know this: The only election yesterday between a dem and a repub, PA-12, went to the dem even AFTER the republicans spent 1/10 of their cash on hand on the race and other con groups spent another $500,000. $1.5 million to lose a race that will be up for grabs again in 5 months!
That doesn't bode well for republicans in November.
My black, handicapped, jewish, liberal boyfriend says so.
Is this another example of Anon showing his bias, racism and hatred?
If you are referring to my post, which line did I mention blacks, babies, malt or tobacco? Where did I mention any percentage of tax? Is your rant your own view or your own biased perception of your self created stereo type? I am honestly at a loss at how my comments could offend anyone except someone looking to be offended.
Post a Comment