Monday, January 16, 2012

"Right" To Privacy ?

No, it's not in the Constitution, although if you are a liberal social engineer with the divine ability to see things that are not actually there, it is. It's also there if you're a female who wants a free abortion, or if you're gay and want to "have your fun" anytime and anywhere you like. But what of the rest of us? Do we have a right to privacy? In fact, here in 2012, with private companies able to track your every move via your cell phone, is there any such thing as privacy?

What if the govt. wants to attach an ankle bracelet to your child (the very same kind they put on criminals ) using the excuse that they want to monitor your child's eating habits? Does your child have the same right to privacy as gays and pregnant females? Not according to the govt.

You see, the govt. health-Nazi's have decided that your child is obese. In fact, they claim obesity is a deadly situation that is sweeping the nation. Of course, if you are the govt., and you control the definition of obese, you can set the bar anywhere you like. You can, in fact, designate every child in America as "obese". Why would they do that? CONTROL! There's is nothing that gets a leftist social engineer more excited than having the ability to control the lives of everyone. Also, there's hundreds-of-billions that can then be spent (see: stolen, wasted, given away) on programs to combat a national problem that they have invented! It wouldn't be the first time the govt. has come up with "solutions" to problems that don't exist...


http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/schools_spy_on_fat_kids_HpPAgsKXPYjt1EWFfaNp9K?CMP=OTC-rss&FEEDNAME=

13 comments:

Bill O'Writes said...

The right to privacy is not a part of the Constitution, at least not in so many words. The right to privacy would best be seen in the 9th Amendment, which basically says that just because a right is not in the Constitution, does not necessarily mean that it does not exist. The justices of the Supreme Court, in several cases over the past half century, have found that a right to privacy does exist in the Constitution, to a degree. The cases that started the process of the "finding" of this new right began with cases like Loving v Virginia, where it was ruled that the state cannot prevent mixed-race marriages; and like Griswold v Connecticut, where it was ruled that a state cannot prevent a married couple from buying and using condoms. The first mention of a right to privacy was in a dissenting opinion in Olmstead v US in 1928, in which Justice Brandeis argued that the Framers had created a framework for the greatest right of all: "the right to be left alone."

The Supreme Court has found that this right to privacy appears in the Constitution in several pre-existing forms. For example, the police are not allowed to search your home or papers without a warrant, which is a direct protection of privacy. The majority of the justices found a right to privacy in some form, a right which could be expanded. Some justices argued that since there is no right to privacy directly enumerated in the Constitution, such a right does not exist. With all due respect, however, this is exactly the sort of argument that the 9th was designed to counter. The right is far from absolute, and many invasions of privacy, such as drug tests and the census, have been upheld by the Supreme Court.

Glockinpoot said...

Way I hear it, ya'll rights come from Gawd. My rights, on the other hand, come from Glock.
Eat Me!!!!!!

BOW said...

Correction...Your rights come from God and are protected by Glock

eat me said...

fat kids are funny

TERDmUNK said...

Fat Dead Kids are hilarious

Boner Nose said...

Did anybody see Kate Evans yesterday? Hot shit or what! Like a nice shot of her ass.

Anonymous said...

No, but you could've included a pic.

Boner Poots said...

Sorry, couldn't find a good one on my droid. If yer on a full sized computer see what you can find.

A. Levy said...

Amendment IX

"The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people..."

Could mean just about anything, couldn't it.

Anonymous said...

Kate Evans, but no nice ass.

http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images;
_ylt=A0PDoYA1lRVPbSMA_LWLuLkF?p=Kate+Evans&ei=utf-8&iscqry=&fr=sfp

Nebber Mind said...

Meant KELLY EVANS, at the debate.

Schteveo said...

I want a Right to my Tax Refund Amendment!!!

I'm STILL fighting for my ObanaBucks from buying this house! The IRS wants proof that HUD sold me the house!

You'd think two faxes would solve this shit.

Anonymous said...

U B D wrong shade