Thursday, January 31, 2013

The voice of reason in the gun debate

I think there should be discussions about guns.  I think it should be open, honest and NOT done directly after a mass shooting.  What I think shouldn't happen is that THIS GUY should never be on camera or in the MSM as anything other than an example of WHY we have firearms.
.
Jerome McCorry organized a protest against a gun show, claiming that the gun show made it too easy to buy guns. Why did that worry him? Perhaps because because the easy availability of guns might have made his career as a rapist more dangerous.
.
Outside of Bill Goodman’s Gun and Knife Show, people were protesting the sale of assault weapons. Those are the guns which the proposed bill would ban inside Hara Arena.

“We know that guns are being sold on the floor inside Hara Arena illegally” said Jerome McCorry. “No background checks no identification of any kind.”
 McCorry said “AK-47s and M16s are not gonna be used for hunting, they’re not going to be used to protect anybody. These are the weapons that are coming back and being used in mass murders and mass killings.”

And Jerome is an expert on what kind of guns can be used to protect someone, since he is the kind of guy that people buy guns to protect against.

But according to him, you don’t need an AK-47 or M16 to stop him from raping you. It’s just overkill. When Jerome bursts into your bedroom, you don’t need that much firepower, says the guy bursting into your bedroom.
.
The links for the story show that this 'expert' and social activist is a rapist, with a felony conviction that keeps him from owning any guns.  One more item to prove that the MSM is a willing and active accomplice in the dissolution of our country.
.
.
Schteveo

2 comments:

Spider said...

M-16? Ya mean we can buy those? I wish he would've said where.

Hey, all you gun nuts are the same. You think you need guns to protect your loved ones. Well, if you would simply listen to the fat, ugly dyke who runs the Dept. of Homeland Stupidity, you would realize that you don't need no stinkin guns.

(Disclaimer: Her(?) advice does not apply to the army of heavily-armed bodyguards that protect her)

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/shear_bravery_beats_guns_feds_d9BanDpupuVezePd6trYoM

alan said...

He is correct though, I don't need an M16 to protect myself from him. a .22 works just fine, but a 12 guage makes protecting myself even easier.

My concern is, and always will be, how do I protect myself from the people that are convinced that I don't need protection from them....if I only do exactly, and believe exactly what they want me to.