Wednesday, July 21, 2010

It's About Health?

Millions of Americans are investing in gold because of the fear they have about our country's future and economy, and the destructive things this Marxist government is doing to both. Personally, i thought about getting involved in gold about three years ago, but unfortunately, (perhaps) thinking about it is all i did.

Apparently, some of the incompetent, lying crooks in congress have been watching also, but for a totally different reason. Their reason for watching? To make sure they take anything you may earn. And, in this new age of "transparency", they hid their plan deep inside the so-called Health Care legislation that was shoved down our throats. Not being one of the elected lying crooks, i can't say what gold has to do with the health plan, other than it's a neat place to hide a law that will further erode our liberty and freedom, and gives the already notorious IRS the power of Hitler's SS. Of course, this may not be a big deal to those who are not invested in gold. But, what could turn out to be a "very" big deal, is what else is lurking in that massive, unreadable, largely unknown, "health care" bill that is now law?

I wonder if our grandchildren will look back at this time in our history and wonder why, and how, we could have been so weak and stupid as to allow all this to happen...


http://abcnews.go.com/Business/gold-coin-dealers-decry-tax-law/story?id=11211611

4 comments:

Jimbo said...

I just acquired a several ounces of gold that satisfies an old debt.

This changes its value.

Democrats = thieves.

"Grammie" or whatever name he wants to call me!! said...

My husband just told me this news today! "Starting Jan. 1, 2012, Form 1099s will become a means of reporting to the Internal Revenue Service the purchases of all goods and services by small businesses and self-employed people that exceed $600 during a calendar year." Looks if we're gonna buy, we better buy soon!

Spider said...

Lady-Bug, is that you in the thumbnail covered up by all those fishies? That's not fair! ;)

BOW said...

And that's in aggregate, per vendor or vendee, not per transaction