Friday, September 11, 2009

Following the Party Line, oh the poor, oh the underprivileged, blah, blah, blah

.
The AP has an article out this morning about "The Ones" first September 11, in the WH. But it just parrots the same old crap.
.
It even says that within a short time, BOHICA wrote a blurb about WHY this attack happened.
.
Within days, he'd issued a statement about what the nation should do next.

Beyond the immediate needs to improve security and dismantle "organizations of destruction," Obama wrote, lay the more difficult job of "understanding the sources of such madness." He wrote of "a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers," of "embittered children" around the world, of the seeds of discontent sown in poverty, ignorance and despair.

.
But that is the typical LIBERAL view of the world. In actuality, the 9/11 hijackers and mass murders were from middle-class and upper middle-class Saudi families, most of them had good educations and time in college. They were NOT the poor or downtrodden or uneducated. They were the indoctrinated and the misled.

And as to his answer of dismantling, understanding the sources, etc., that's all BS from anyone as uber lib as him. Unfortunately the ONLY way to fight someone who is willing and seeking to die for his cause, is to grant that wish. But we know from prior experience that BOHICA, and Liberal Dems as a whole, have trouble openly killing our enemies. They'd rather endanger us, than drop that hammer.
.
I guess that's easier to do and consider if you've got the Secret Service to cover your ass 24/7. But the people on those planes, in those Towers or at the Pentagon didn't have that protection, did they? Nor do we my friends.
.
.
Schteveo
.
PS thanks to all of you who have served our country. Especially since that bad, bad day. It's been too little accolade for the jobs you've done. I salute you.
.

5 comments:

Spider said...

"Dismantle organizations of destruction"? Obummer probably means Conservative Republicans. It's just more of the usual leftist crap that the MSM laps up. The poor. The poor. Is he talking about all those 400 lb. black people we see on TV every time somebody talks about the poor? (i still can't figure how people who (claim) to have nothing to eat get so fat) By using the "poor", he may be able to get another 30% increase in welfare benefits from congress.

Isn't it funny how leftists cringe at the thought of hurting a terrorist, but have no problem killing hundreds-of-thousands of unborn babies every year?

Schteveo said...

Ditto what Spider said, but don't forget, there are plenty of fat, welfare riding, PWT too.

Anonymous said...

Really? Compare the numbers!

BOW said...

I have little compassion for those who are capable but refuse to do anything for themselves

Anonymous said...

"You don't work, you don't eat"..... George Wallace