Saturday, February 28, 2009

Great Oaks from tiny Acorns grow

.
Sometimes I see a story and I think it's no big deal. Then I hear it three days later, and it becomes an "Oh My God", moment. That's how the following story hit me.
.
Today's culture warriors have better things to argue about than pot-smoking hippies, yet federal marijuana laws are still stuck in the Nixon-era days when conservatives feared that reefer madness was destroying the minds of America's youth. Amid that time warp, efforts by California and other states to nudge Washington in the direction of more sensible drug laws have largely been welcome. But whether or not you're in the camp that thinks marijuana should be legalized, a proposal to regulate and tax its sale as a way of helping to balance California's budget is an idea whose time has not come.

A bill from Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco -- where else?) that would do precisely that was introduced Monday. It would, first, decriminalize the possession and sale of marijuana under state law, and, second, set up a system for regulating and taxing it. The sales and taxation part only happens, though, if the federal government decriminalizes marijuana too, or at least allows states to make their own decisions about the drug.
.
Ammiano and his supporters argue that the state is losing out on more than $1 billion a year in tax revenues because its biggest cash crop, marijuana, is illegal and therefore not taxable.

.
And here's the weird part. Our new Attorney General, Eric "don't be a racial coward" Holder, is telling California that the DEA is going to quit bothering the Medical Marijuana Clinics.
.
In my mind though, it gets more Twilight Zone twisted.
.
What if, given the bizarre thought patterns of liberals, the unintended benefit of this is the states taking draconian powers AWAY from the feds, and giving it to the themselves, the local liberals? Suppose this is a chink in the armor of the federal power structure?
.
Bet you are thinking, "...Steve's finally LOST it. His choo choo has disappeared around the bend...poor bastard, the pressure got to him...[taps blowing in the background]..."
.
Well, bullshit!!
.
The state of California is in a depression. They are looking for revenue streams. Here's one with an ongoing BILLIONS of dollars to be netted, known money, now untouchable, waiting to be plucked. But there are at least a dozen other states where the DEA and Ag Department says pot is the number one crop.
.
Hawaii, Kentucky, Mississippi, Florida and right here North Carolina are on the list. None of them has a pot to piss in right now. They're watching CA and the DEA like a hawk. Revenue is revenue. And billions are hard to pass up.

OK, I've set the table, served the shrimp cocktail, and here's the entree.
.
There are a thousand other things that the federales NOW control, that the states SHOULD control, that can be minimally taxed to help the states get back on their feet. Ultimately, power can trickle back to the states.
.
It's a thin line I admit, but one to hope for.
.
.
Schteveo

9 comments:

Spider said...

Ironically, i was watching a program on the National Geographic channel the other night on this very topic. It was about this town in northern Mexifornia, (sorry, i don't recall the name) a town who's only function was the growing of marijuana on a "huge" scale. The whole town and everybody in it is involved! Of course, the excuse given is that, "they're growing it for the medical community", as the growing, sale, possession, and use of pot is legal in Mexifornia, so long as you have a perscription from a Dr. (which should take about 4 seconds to get)

Spider said...

(sorry, i hit the wrong button)

Personally, i believe marijuana should be legalized. Right now, the Feds have it listed as a "class-1 narcotic", along with heroin, cocaine, crack, etc. Actually, the real reason for this has nothing to do with drugs, but everything to do with control. If there's anything the govt. hates, it's something they can't control. And in this case, the control factor even outweighs the greed factor. (tax everything)

In fact, the entire idiotic "war on drugs" was/is about control, which is one of the reasons it's been an outright failure. As someone who spent many years on the front lines of that war, i can tell you that it's a war that was never intended to be won, only fought for the benefit of PR.

As for the so-called "addiction" fear associated with weed, i don't buy it. Hey, there are people who get addicted to Cheerios! If you as an individual have a weak, addictive personalty, you can become addicted to anything.

Then, there are the widely-known medical benefits this plant has, benefits that have been known for a thousand years. IMO, the benefits of making pot legal far outweigh any problems that may occur. We, as a society, (and especially our govt.) just need to grow up.

Schteveo said...

Spider,
we agree on the legalization. I've long espoused a belief in legalization / taxation and education on pot. Instead of spending millions on eradication, let's make billions on the trade, just like corn, or soy beans.

Some of those guys in N. California have been there for 40 years. LONG before medical mary jane. But then again, some of them are 2nd or even 3rd generation dope growers. Those same types exist here in NC, I'm not naming names though, it's mostly just "stuff I heard".

[the wink wink, nudge nudge is implied]

nerd said...

Humboldt County, California is the largest marijuana growing area in the country. The town was probably Ukiah or Arcata. The war on drugs is the single largest boondoggle in the history of the federal goverment.

Jimbo said...

Here! Here! Good post el Schteveo. I've worked in Tom Ammiano's district - and believe me; this is the ONLY time I've ever agreed with the socialist nut-case.

"None of them has a pot to piss in right now."

He-he-he. Steve made a funny!

I say - leave it up to the States. And if the vote came up in my State, I'd vote to legalize the heathen devil weed (and quit taxing fuel). Win-win.

I knew a guy in the 70's that did 4-years in Huntsville for a marijuana seed in the trunk of his car. (He was on probation for a previous possession charge.) And he was a contributing member of society! It was a gross miscarriage of justice.

Anonymous said...

Then they would be placing an onerous tax on poor, lazy, liberal pot-heads instead of the wage-earners, uh, I mean wealthy people.

nerd said...

Jimbo,

Do you remember Lee Otis Johnson?

nerd said...

The war on drugs is over! Drugs won.

"Grammie" or whatever name he wants to call me!! said...

"I say - leave it up to the States. And if the vote came up in my State, I'd vote to legalize the heathen devil weed (and quit taxing fuel). Win-win."

"Then they would be placing an onerous tax on poor, lazy, liberal pot-heads instead of the wage-earners, uh, I mean wealthy people."

Again, ditto and ditto. The only problem is the current administration would tax pot AND fuel, pot-heads AND wage-earners.