Is this the most counterproductive article of the year?
. If a bunch of people increase their carbon foot print, to see these places before they disappear, won't these special places disappear that much quicker? . . Schteveo .
5 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I think they should go to those places, but only if they promis not to come back!
It's under the guise of educating folks; the reality being to make money.
These laces are beautiful and should be preserved and protected.
A generation ago, the effort was to curb the population explosion. But our current liberal crop can't blame these third world countries when it comes to the guardianship of their resources.
So they blame us when we are doing what we can to feed these nations who hate us, terrorize us and blame us for their ills.
Except, of course, my beloved CR, where they truly love Americans (and not the quiche eating ones)
5 comments:
I think they should go to those places, but only if they promis not to come back!
It's under the guise of educating folks; the reality being to make money.
These laces are beautiful and should be preserved and protected.
A generation ago, the effort was to curb the population explosion. But our current liberal crop can't blame these third world countries when it comes to the guardianship of their resources.
So they blame us when we are doing what we can to feed these nations who hate us, terrorize us and blame us for their ills.
Except, of course, my beloved CR, where they truly love Americans (and not the quiche eating ones)
Yes, ecoterrorism does seem to be on the rise.
I kanow.... they can visit the crack of my ass after cabbage and corned beef, they can view and experience global warming first hand.
I say give the tree-huggers what they want, a tree. I'll be happy to supply the rope and horse.
Post a Comment